Source author record

Alexander J. Gabourie

Alexander J. Gabourie appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

2works
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Substrate-Dependence of Monolayer MoS$_2$ Thermal Conductivity and Thermal Boundary Conductance

The thermal properties of two-dimensional (2D) materials, like MoS$_2$, are known to be affected by interactions with their environment, but this has primarily been studied only with SiO$_2$ substrates. Here, we compare the thermal conductivity (TC) and thermal boundary conductance (TBC) of monolayer MoS$_2$ on amorphous (a-) and crystalline (c-) SiO$_2$, AlN, Al$_2$O$_3$, and $\textit{h}$-BN monolayers using molecular dynamics. The room temperature TC of MoS$_2$ is ~38 Wm$^{-1}$K$^{-1}$ on amorphous substrates and up to ~68 Wm$^{-1}$K$^{-1}$ on crystalline substrates, with most of the difference due to substrate interactions with long-wavelength MoS$_2$ phonons (< 2 THz). An $\textit{h}$-BN monolayer used as a buffer between MoS$_2$ and the substrate causes the MoS$_2$ TC to increase by up to 50%. Length-dependent calculations reveal TC size effects below ~2 $μ$m and show that the MoS$_2$ TC is size- but not substrate-limited below ~100 nm. We also find that the TBC of MoS$_2$ with c-Al$_2$O$_3$ is over twice that with c-AlN despite a similar MoS$_2$ TC on both, indicating that the TC and TBC could be tuned independently. Finally, we compare the thermal resistance of MoS$_2$ transistors on all substrates to show that MoS$_2$ TBC is the most important parameter for heat removal for long-channel (> 150 nm) devices, while TBC and TC are equally important for short channels. This work provides important insights for electro-thermal applications of 2D materials on various substrates.

preprint2020arXiv

Reduced Thermal Conductivity of Supported and Encased Monolayer and Bilayer MoS$_2$

Electrical and thermal properties of atomically thin two-dimensional (2D) materials are affected by their environment, e.g. through remote phonon scattering or dielectric screening. However, while it is known that mobility and thermal conductivity (TC) of graphene are reduced on a substrate, these effects are much less explored in 2D semiconductors such as MoS$_2$. Here, we use molecular dynamics to understand TC changes in monolayer (1L) and bilayer (2L) MoS$_2$ by comparing suspended, supported, and encased structures. The TC of monolayer MoS$_2$ is reduced from ~117 Wm$^{-1}$K$^{-1}$ when suspended, to ~31 Wm$^{-1}$K$^{-1}$ when supported by SiO$_2$, at 300 K. Encasing 1L MoS$_2$ in SiO$_2$ further reduces its TC down to ~22 Wm$^{-1}$K$^{-1}$. In contrast, the TC of 2L MoS$_2$ is not as drastically reduced, being >50% higher than 1L both when supported and encased. These effects are due to phonon scattering with remote vibrational modes of the substrate, which are partly screened in 2L MoS$_2$. We also examine the TC of 1L MoS$_2$ across a wide range of temperatures (300 to 700 K) and defect densities (up to 5$\times$10$^{13}$ cm$^{-2}$), finding that the substrate reduces the dependence of TC on these factors. Taken together, these are important findings for all applications which will use 2D semiconductors supported or encased by insulators, instead of freely suspended.