BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Alexander Gaskell

Alexander Gaskell contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
eess.ASMachine LearningSound

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2021arXiv

End-2-End COVID-19 Detection from Breath & Cough Audio

Our main contributions are as follows: (I) We demonstrate the first attempt to diagnose COVID-19 using end-to-end deep learning from a crowd-sourced dataset of audio samples, achieving ROC-AUC of 0.846; (II) Our model, the COVID-19 Identification ResNet, (CIdeR), has potential for rapid scalability, minimal cost and improving performance as more data becomes available. This could enable regular COVID-19 testing at apopulation scale; (III) We introduce a novel modelling strategy using a custom deep neural network to diagnose COVID-19 from a joint breath and cough representation; (IV) We release our four stratified folds for cross parameter optimisation and validation on a standard public corpus and details on the models for reproducibility and future reference.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Detecting COVID-19 from Breathing and Coughing Sounds using Deep Neural Networks

The COVID-19 pandemic has affected the world unevenly; while industrial economies have been able to produce the tests necessary to track the spread of the virus and mostly avoided complete lockdowns, developing countries have faced issues with testing capacity. In this paper, we explore the usage of deep learning models as a ubiquitous, low-cost, pre-testing method for detecting COVID-19 from audio recordings of breathing or coughing taken with mobile devices or via the web. We adapt an ensemble of Convolutional Neural Networks that utilise raw breathing and coughing audio and spectrograms to classify if a speaker is infected with COVID-19 or not. The different models are obtained via automatic hyperparameter tuning using Bayesian Optimisation combined with HyperBand. The proposed method outperforms a traditional baseline approach by a large margin. Ultimately, it achieves an Unweighted Average Recall (UAR) of 74.9%, or an Area Under ROC Curve (AUC) of 80.7% by ensembling neural networks, considering the best test set result across breathing and coughing in a strictly subject independent manner. In isolation, breathing sounds thereby appear slightly better suited than coughing ones (76.1% vs 73.7% UAR).

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access