Researcher profile

Alex Sheremet

Alex Sheremet contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
2topics
1close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Mesoscopic Collective Activity in Excitatory Neural Fields: Cross-frequency Coupling

In the brain, cross-frequency coupling has been hypothesized to result from the activity of specialized microcircuits. For example, theta-gamma coupling is assumed to be generated by specialized cell pairs (PING and ING mechanisms), or special cells (e.g., fast bursting neurons). However, this implies that the generating mechanisms is uniquely specific to the brain. In fact, cross-scale coupling is a phenomenon encountered in the physics of all large, multi-scale systems: phase and amplitude correlations between components of different scales arise as a result of nonlinear interaction. Because the brain is a multi-scale system too, a similar mechanism must be active in the brain. Here, we represent brain activity as a superposition of nonlinearly interacting patterns of spatio-temporal activity (collective activity), supported by populations of neurons. Cross-frequency coupling is a direct consequence of the nonlinear interactions, and does not require specialized cells or cell pairs. It is therefore universal, and must be active in neural fields of any composition. To emphasize this, we demonstrate the phenomenon in excitatory fields. While there is no doubt that specialized cells play a role in theta-gamma coupling, our results suggest that the coupling mechanism is at the same time simpler and richer: simpler because it involves the universal principle of nonlinearity; richer, because nonlinearity of collective activity is likely modulated by specialized-cell populations in ways to be yet understood.

preprint2022arXiv

Mesoscopic Collective Activity in Excitatory Neural Fields: Governing Equations

In this study we derive the governing equations for mesoscopic collective activity in the cortex, starting from the generic Hodgkin-Huxley equations for microscopic cell dynamics. For simplicity, and to maintain focus on the essential elements of the derivation, the discussion is confined to excitatory neural fields. The fundamental assumption of the procedure is that mesoscale processes are macroscopic with respect to cell-scale activity, and emerge as the average behavior of a large population of cells. Because of their duration, action-potential details are assumed not observable at mesoscale; the essential mesoscopic function of action potentials is to redistribute energy in the neural field. The Hodgkin-Huxley dynamical model is first reduced to a set of equations that describe subthreshold dynamics. An ensemble average over a cell population then produces a closed system of equations involving two mesoscopic state variables: the density of kinetic energy J, carried by sodium ionic currents, and the excitability H of the neural field, which could be described as the average state of gating variable h. The resulting model is represented as essentially a subthreshold process; and the dynamical role of the firing rate is naturally reassessed as describing energy transfers. The linear properties of the equations are consistent with expectations for the dynamics of excitatory neural fields: the system supports oscillations of progressive waves, with shorter waves typically having higher frequencies, propagating slower, and decaying faster. Extending the derivation to include more complex cell dynamics (e.g., including other ionic channels, e.g., calcium channels) and multiple-type, excitatory-inhibitory, neural fields is straightforward, and will be presented elsewhere.