BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Alex Rice

Alex Rice contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
math.COLogic in Computer Sciencemath.CAmath.MGmath.NT

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

A Type Theory for Strictly Unital $\infty$-Categories

We use type-theoretic techniques to present an algebraic theory of $\infty$-categories with strict units. Starting with a known type-theoretic presentation of fully weak $\infty$-categories, in which terms denote valid operations, we extend the theory with a non-trivial definitional equality. This forces some operations to coincide strictly in any model, yielding the strict unit behaviour. We make a detailed investigation of the meta-theoretic properties of this theory. We give a reduction relation that generates definitional equality, and prove that it is confluent and terminating, thus yielding the first decision procedure for equality in a strictly-unital setting. Moreover, we show that our definitional equality relation identifies all terms in a disc context, providing a point comparison with a previously proposed definition of strictly unital $\infty$-category. We also prove a conservativity result, showing that every operation of the strictly unital theory indeed arises from a valid operation in the fully weak theory. From this, we infer that strict unitality is a property of an $\infty$-category rather than additional structure.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

The pigenhole principle and multicolor Ramsey numbers

For integers $k,r\geq 2$, the diagonal Ramsey number $R_r(k)$ is the minimum $N\in\mathbb{N}$ such that every $r$-coloring of the edges of a complete graph on $N$ vertices yields on a monochromatic subgraph on $k$ vertices. Here we make a careful effort of extracting explicit upper bounds for $R_r(k)$ from the pigeonhole principle alone. Our main term improves on previously documented explicit bounds for $r\geq 3$, and we also consider an often ignored secondary term, which allows us to subtract a uniformly bounded below positive proportion of the main term. Asymptotically, we give a self-contained proof that $R_r(k)\leq \left(\frac{3+e}{2}\right)\frac{(r(k-2))!}{((k-2)!)^r}(1+o_{r\to \infty}(1)),$ and we conclude by noting that our methods combine with previous estimates on $R_r(3)$ to improve the constant $\frac{3+e}{2}$ to $\frac{3+e}{2}-\frac{d}{48}$, where $d=66-R_4(3)\geq 4$. We also compare our formulas, and previously documented formulas, to some collected numerical data.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

A Maximal Extension of the Best-Known Bounds for the Furstenberg-Sárközy Theorem

We show that if $h\in \mathbb{Z}[x]$ is a polynomial of degree $k \geq 2$ such that $h(\mathbb{N})$ contains a multiple of $q$ for every $q\in \mathbb{N}$, known as an $\textit{intersective polynomial}$, then any subset of $\{1,2,\dots,N\}$ with no nonzero differences of the form $h(n)$ for $n\in\mathbb{N}$ has density at most a constant depending on $h$ and $c$ times $(\log N)^{-c\log\log\log\log N}$, for any $c<(\log((k^2+k)/2))^{-1}$. Bounds of this type were previously known only for monomials and intersective quadratics, and this is currently the best-known bound for the original Furstenberg-Sárközy Theorem, i.e. $h(n)=n^2$. The intersective condition is necessary to force any density decay for polynomial difference-free sets, and in that sense our result is the maximal extension of this particular quantitative estimate. Further, we show that if $g,h\in \mathbb{Z}[x]$ are intersective, then any set lacking nonzero differences of the form $g(m)+h(n)$ for $m,n\in \mathbb{N}$ has density at most $\exp(-c(\log N)^μ)$, where $c=c(g,h)>0$, $μ=μ(\text{deg}(g),\text{deg}(h))>0$, and $μ(2,2)=1/2$. We also include a brief discussion of sums of three or more polynomials in the final section.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Sets in $\mathbb{R}^d$ determining $k$ taxicab distances

We address an analog of a problem introduced by Erdős and Fishburn, itself an inverse formulation of the famous Erdős distance problem, in which the usual Euclidean distance is replaced with the metric induced by the $\ell^1$-norm, commonly referred to as the $\textit{taxicab metric}$. Specifically, we investigate the following question: given $d,k\in \mathbb{N}$, what is the maximum size of a subset of $\mathbb{R}^d$ that determines at most $k$ distinct taxicab distances, and can all such optimal arrangements be classified? We completely resolve the question in dimension $d=2$, as well as the $k=1$ case in dimension $d=3$, and we also provide a full resolution in the general case under an additional hypothesis.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access