BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Alessandro Ragano

Alessandro Ragano contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
eess.ASSoundMachine Learning

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

AQP: An Open Modular Python Platform for Objective Speech and Audio Quality Metrics

Audio quality assessment has been widely researched in the signal processing area. Full-reference objective metrics (e.g., POLQA, ViSQOL) have been developed to estimate the audio quality relying only on human rating experiments. To evaluate the audio quality of novel audio processing techniques, researchers constantly need to compare objective quality metrics. Testing different implementations of the same metric and evaluating new datasets are fundamental and ongoing iterative activities. In this paper, we present AQP - an open-source, node-based, light-weight Python pipeline for audio quality assessment. AQP allows researchers to test and compare objective quality metrics helping to improve robustness, reproducibility and development speed. We introduce the platform, explain the motivations, and illustrate with examples how, using AQP, objective quality metrics can be (i) compared and benchmarked; (ii) prototyped and adapted in a modular fashion; (iii) visualised and checked for errors. The code has been shared on GitHub to encourage adoption and contributions from the community.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Exploring the influence of fine-tuning data on wav2vec 2.0 model for blind speech quality prediction

Recent studies have shown how self-supervised models can produce accurate speech quality predictions. Speech representations generated by the pre-trained wav2vec 2.0 model allows constructing robust predicting models using small amounts of annotated data. This opens the possibility of developing strong models in scenarios where labelled data is scarce. It is known that fine-tuning improves the model's performance; however, it is unclear how the data (e.g., language, amount of samples) used for fine-tuning is influencing that performance. In this paper, we explore how using different speech corpus to fine-tune the wav2vec 2.0 can influence its performance. We took four speech datasets containing degradations found in common conferencing applications and fine-tuned wav2vec 2.0 targeting different languages and data size scenarios. The fine-tuned models were tested across all four conferencing datasets plus an additional dataset containing synthetic speech and they were compared against three external baseline models. Results showed that fine-tuned models were able to compete with baseline models. Larger fine-tune data guarantee better performance; meanwhile, diversity in language helped the models deal with specific languages. Further research is needed to evaluate other wav2vec 2.0 models pre-trained with multi-lingual datasets and to develop prediction models that are more resilient to language diversity.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Using Rater and System Metadata to Explain Variance in the VoiceMOS Challenge 2022 Dataset

Non-reference speech quality models are important for a growing number of applications. The VoiceMOS 2022 challenge provided a dataset of synthetic voice conversion and text-to-speech samples with subjective labels. This study looks at the amount of variance that can be explained in subjective ratings of speech quality from metadata and the distribution imbalances of the dataset. Speech quality models were constructed using wav2vec 2.0 with additional metadata features that included rater groups and system identifiers and obtained competitive metrics including a Spearman rank correlation coefficient (SRCC) of 0.934 and MSE of 0.088 at the system-level, and 0.877 and 0.198 at the utterance-level. Using data and metadata that the test restricted or blinded further improved the metrics. A metadata analysis showed that the system-level metrics do not represent the model's system-level prediction as a result of the wide variation in the number of utterances used for each system on the validation and test datasets. We conclude that, in general, conditions should have enough utterances in the test set to bound the sample mean error, and be relatively balanced in utterance count between systems, otherwise the utterance-level metrics may be more reliable and interpretable.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access