BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Alberto Marcone

Alberto Marcone contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
math.LOmath.COLogic in Computer Sciencemath.DSmath.FA

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
8works
0followers
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

8 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

The reverse mathematics of Brooks' theorem

This is an analysis of the status of Brooks' Theorem, a celebrated result in graph coloring, from the point of view of Reverse Mathematics. We prove that the restriction of Brooks' theorem to bounded graphs of degree greater than or equal to $3$ is provable in $\mathsf{RCA}_0$, while the statement for arbitrary graphs is equivalent to $\mathsf{WKL}_0$ over $\mathsf{RCA}_0$. Brooks' Theorem for degree $2$, even when restricted to bounded graphs, is equivalent to $\mathsf{WKL}_0$ over $\mathsf{RCA}_0$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Effective aspects of Hausdorff and Fourier dimension

In this paper, we study Hausdorff and Fourier dimension from the point of view of effective descriptive set theory and Type-2 Theory of Effectivity. Working in the hyperspace $\mathbf{K}(X)$ of compact subsets of $X$, with $X=[0,1]^d$ or $X=\mathbb{R}^d$, we characterize the complexity of the family of sets having sufficiently large Hausdorff or Fourier dimension. This, in turn, allows us to show that family of all the closed Salem sets is $Π^0_3$-complete. One of our main tools is a careful analysis of the effectiveness of a classical theorem of Kaufman. We furthermore compute the Weihrauch degree of the functions computing Hausdorff and Fourier dimension of closed sets.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Uniquely orderable interval graphs

Interval graphs and interval orders are deeply linked. In fact, edges of an interval graphs represent the incomparability relation of an interval order, and in general, of different interval orders. The question about the conditions under which a given interval graph is associated to a unique interval order (up to duality) arises naturally. Fishburn provided a characterisation for uniquely orderable finite connected interval graphs. We show, by an entirely new proof, that the same characterisation holds also for infinite connected interval graphs. Using tools from reverse mathematics, we explain why the characterisation cannot be lifted from the finite to the infinite by compactness, as it often happens.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

On the descriptive complexity of Salem sets

In this paper we study the notion of Salem set from the point of view of descriptive set theory. We first work in the hyperspace $\mathbf{K}([0,1])$ of compact subsets of $[0,1]$ and show that the closed Salem sets form a $\boldsymbolΠ^0_3$-complete family. This is done by characterizing the complexity of the family of sets having sufficiently large Hausdorff or Fourier dimension. We also show that the complexity does not change if we increase the dimension of the ambient space and work in $\mathbf{K}([0,1]^d)$. We then generalize the results by relaxing the compactness of the ambient space, and show that the closed Salem sets are still $\boldsymbolΠ^0_3$-complete when we endow the hyperspace of all closed subsets of $\mathbb{R}^d$ with the Fell topology. A similar result holds also for the Vietoris topology.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Polish metric spaces with fixed distance set

We study Polish spaces for which a set of possible distances $A \subseteq \mathbb{R}^+$ is fixed in advance. We determine, depending on the properties of $A$, the complexity of the collection of all Polish metric spaces with distances in $A$, obtaining also example of sets in some Wadge classes where not many natural examples are known. Moreover we describe the properties that $A$ must have in order that all Polish spaces with distances in that set belong to a given class, such as zero-dimensional, locally compact, etc. These results lead us to give a fairly complete description of the complexity, with respect to Borel reducibility and again depending on the properties of $A$, of the relations of isometry and isometric embeddability between these Polish spaces.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2019arXiv

The reverse mathematics of wqos and bqos

In this paper we survey wqo and bqo theory from the reverse mathematics perspective. We consider both elementary results (such as the equivalence of different definitions of the concepts, and basic closure properties) and more advanced theorems. The classification from the reverse mathematics viewpoint of both kinds of results provides interesting challenges, and we cover also recent advances on some long standing open problems.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access