BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Alan Mycroft

Alan Mycroft contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Programming LanguagesDistributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2013arXiv

Mapping the Join Calculus to Heterogeneous Hardware

As modern architectures introduce additional heterogeneity and parallelism, we look for ways to deal with this that do not involve specialising software to every platform. In this paper, we take the Join Calculus, an elegant model for concurrent computation, and show how it can be mapped to an architecture by a Cartesian-product-style construction, thereby making use of the calculus' inherent non-determinism to encode placement choices. This unifies the concepts of placement and scheduling into a single task.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Efficient and Correct Stencil Computation via Pattern Matching and Static Typing

Stencil computations, involving operations over the elements of an array, are a common programming pattern in scientific computing, games, and image processing. As a programming pattern, stencil computations are highly regular and amenable to optimisation and parallelisation. However, general-purpose languages obscure this regular pattern from the compiler, and even the programmer, preventing optimisation and obfuscating (in)correctness. This paper furthers our work on the Ypnos domain-specific language for stencil computations embedded in Haskell. Ypnos allows declarative, abstract specification of stencil computations, exposing the structure of a problem to the compiler and to the programmer via specialised syntax. In this paper we show the decidable safety guarantee that well-formed, well-typed Ypnos programs cannot index outside of array boundaries. Thus indexing in Ypnos is safe and run-time bounds checking can be eliminated. Program information is encoded as types, using the advanced type-system features of the Glasgow Haskell Compiler, with the safe-indexing invariant enforced at compile time via type checking.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Lazy Pointer Analysis

Flow- and context-sensitive pointer analysis is generally considered too expensive for large programs; most tools relax one or both of the requirements for scalability. We formulate a flow- and context-sensitive points-to analysis that is lazy in the following sense: points-to information is computed only for live pointers and its propagation is sparse (restricted to live ranges of respective pointers). Further, our analysis (a) uses strong liveness, effectively including dead code elimination; (b) afterwards calculates must-points-to information from may-points-to information instead of using a mutual fixed-point; and (c) uses value-based termination of call strings during interprocedural analysis (which reduces the number of call strings significantly). A naive implementation of our analysis within GCC-4.6.0 gave analysis time and size of points-to measurements for SPEC2006. Using liveness reduced the amount of points-to information by an order of magnitude with no loss of precision. For all programs under 30kLoC we found that the results were much more precise than gcc's analysis. What comes as a pleasant surprise however, is the fact that below this cross-over point, our naive linked-list implementation is faster than a flow- and context-insensitive analysis which is primarily used for efficiency. We speculate that lazy flow- and context-sensitive analyses may be not only more precise, but also more efficient, than current approaches.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Proceedings Third Workshop on Programming Language Approaches to Concurrency and communication-cEntric Software

This is the proceedings of PLACES'10, the 3rd Workshop on Programming Language Approaches to Concurrency and Communication-cEntric Software, held in Pathos, Cyprus, on 21st Mach, 2010, co-located with the ETAPS federated conferences. PLACES aims to offer a forum where researchers from different fields exchange new ideas on one of the central challenges in programming in near future, the development of programming methodologies and infrastructures where concurrency and distribution are a norm rather than a marginal concern. The Program Committee, after a careful and thorough reviewing process, selected for presentation in the programme 10 papers out of 14 submissions. Each submission was evaluated by at least two referees, and the accepted papers were selected during two weeks' electronic discussions. This post-proceedings contain the papers which are based on these submissions, incorporating the result of these and further reviews, resulting in strengthened technical results and presentations.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access