Source author record

Alan J. Michaels

Alan J. Michaels appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

eess.SP Machine Learning

Catalog footprint

What is connected

2works

2topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Open graph Browse works

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2022arXiv

Assessing the Value of Transfer Learning Metrics for RF Domain Adaptation

The use of transfer learning (TL) techniques has become common practice in fields such as computer vision (CV) and natural language processing (NLP). Leveraging prior knowledge gained from data with different distributions, TL offers higher performance and reduced training time, but has yet to be fully utilized in applications of machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) techniques to applications related to wireless communications, a field loosely termed radio frequency machine learning (RFML). This work begins this examination by evaluating the how radio frequency (RF) domain changes encourage or prevent the transfer of features learned by convolutional neural network (CNN)-based automatic modulation classifiers. Additionally, we examine existing transferability metrics, Log Expected Empirical Prediction (LEEP) and Logarithm of Maximum Evidence (LogME), as a means to both select source models for RF domain adaptation and predict post-transfer accuracy without further training.

preprint2021arXiv

Training Data Augmentation for Deep Learning Radio Frequency Systems

Applications of machine learning are subject to three major components that contribute to the final performance metrics. Within the category of neural networks, and deep learning specifically, the first two are the architecture for the model being trained and the training approach used. This work focuses on the third component, the data used during training. The primary questions that arise are ``what is in the data'' and ``what within the data matters?'' Looking into the Radio Frequency Machine Learning (RFML) field of Automatic Modulation Classification (AMC) as an example of a tool used for situational awareness, the use of synthetic, captured, and augmented data are examined and compared to provide insights about the quantity and quality of the available data necessary to achieve desired performance levels. There are three questions discussed within this work: (1) how useful a synthetically trained system is expected to be when deployed without considering the environment within the synthesis, (2) how can augmentation be leveraged within the RFML domain, and lastly, (3) what impact knowledge of degradations to the signal caused by the transmission channel contributes to the performance of a system. In general, the examined data types each have useful contributions to a final application, but captured data germane to the intended use case will always provide more significant information and enable the greatest performance. Despite the benefit of captured data, the difficulties and costs that arise from live collection often make the quantity of data needed to achieve peak performance impractical. This paper helps quantify the balance between real and synthetic data, offering concrete examples where training data is parametrically varied in size and source.