Source author record

Akarsh Prabhakara

Akarsh Prabhakara appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

1works
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

1 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

A Hybrid mmWave and Camera System for Long-Range Depth Imaging

mmWave radars offer excellent depth resolution even at very long ranges owing to their high bandwidth. But their angular resolution is at least an order-of-magnitude worse than camera and lidar systems. Hence, mmWave radar is not a capable 3-D imaging solution in isolation. We propose Metamoran, a system that combines the complimentary strengths of radar and camera to obtain accurate, high resolution depth images over long ranges even in high clutter environments, all from a single fixed vantage point. Metamoran enables rich long-range depth imaging with applications in security and surveillance, roadside safety infrastructure and wide-area mapping. Our approach leverages the high angular resolution from cameras using computer vision techniques, including image segmentation and monocular depth estimation, to obtain object shape. Our core contribution is a method to convert this object shape into an RF I/Q equivalent, which we use in a novel radar processing pipeline to help declutter the scene and capture extremely weak reflections from objects at long distances. We perform a detailed evaluation of Metamoran's depth imaging capabilities in 400 diverse scenes. Our evaluation shows that Metamoran estimates the depth of static objects up to 90 m and moving objects up to 305 m and with a median error of 28 cm, an improvement of 13$\times$ compared to a naive radar+camera baseline and 23$\times$ compared to monocular depth estimation.