Researcher profile

Adityanarayanan Radhakrishnan

Adityanarayanan Radhakrishnan contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 19 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
5works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

The Weight Gram Matrix Captures Sequential Feature Linearization in Deep Networks

Understanding how deep neural networks learn representations remains a central challenge in machine learning theory. In this work, we propose a feature-centric framework for analyzing neural network training by relating weight updates to feature evolution. We introduce a simple identity, the Feature Learning Equation, which identifies the weight Gram matrix as the key object capturing feature dynamics. This enables us to interpret gradient descent as implicitly inducing a hypothetical evolution of features, whose covariance structure - termed the Virtual Covariance - characterizes how representations evolve during training. Building on this perspective, we introduce Target Linearity, a measure quantifying the linear alignment between features and targets. By analyzing the training and layer-wise dynamics, we show that deep networks learn to sequentially transform representations toward target-linear structure. This linearization perspective provides a unified interpretation of several empirical phenomena, including Neural Collapse and linear interpolation in generative models.

preprint2022arXiv

Simple, Fast, and Flexible Framework for Matrix Completion with Infinite Width Neural Networks

Matrix completion problems arise in many applications including recommendation systems, computer vision, and genomics. Increasingly larger neural networks have been successful in many of these applications, but at considerable computational costs. Remarkably, taking the width of a neural network to infinity allows for improved computational performance. In this work, we develop an infinite width neural network framework for matrix completion that is simple, fast, and flexible. Simplicity and speed come from the connection between the infinite width limit of neural networks and kernels known as neural tangent kernels (NTK). In particular, we derive the NTK for fully connected and convolutional neural networks for matrix completion. The flexibility stems from a feature prior, which allows encoding relationships between coordinates of the target matrix, akin to semi-supervised learning. The effectiveness of our framework is demonstrated through competitive results for virtual drug screening and image inpainting/reconstruction. We also provide an implementation in Python to make our framework accessible on standard hardware to a broad audience.

preprint2021arXiv

Local Quadratic Convergence of Stochastic Gradient Descent with Adaptive Step Size

Establishing a fast rate of convergence for optimization methods is crucial to their applicability in practice. With the increasing popularity of deep learning over the past decade, stochastic gradient descent and its adaptive variants (e.g. Adagrad, Adam, etc.) have become prominent methods of choice for machine learning practitioners. While a large number of works have demonstrated that these first order optimization methods can achieve sub-linear or linear convergence, we establish local quadratic convergence for stochastic gradient descent with adaptive step size for problems such as matrix inversion.

preprint2020arXiv

On Alignment in Deep Linear Neural Networks

We study the properties of alignment, a form of implicit regularization, in linear neural networks under gradient descent. We define alignment for fully connected networks with multidimensional outputs and show that it is a natural extension of alignment in networks with 1-dimensional outputs as defined by Ji and Telgarsky, 2018. While in fully connected networks, there always exists a global minimum corresponding to an aligned solution, we analyze alignment as it relates to the training process. Namely, we characterize when alignment is an invariant of training under gradient descent by providing necessary and sufficient conditions for this invariant to hold. In such settings, the dynamics of gradient descent simplify, thereby allowing us to provide an explicit learning rate under which the network converges linearly to a global minimum. We then analyze networks with layer constraints such as convolutional networks. In this setting, we prove that gradient descent is equivalent to projected gradient descent, and that alignment is impossible with sufficiently large datasets.

preprint2020arXiv

Overparameterized Neural Networks Implement Associative Memory

Identifying computational mechanisms for memorization and retrieval of data is a long-standing problem at the intersection of machine learning and neuroscience. Our main finding is that standard overparameterized deep neural networks trained using standard optimization methods implement such a mechanism for real-valued data. Empirically, we show that: (1) overparameterized autoencoders store training samples as attractors, and thus, iterating the learned map leads to sample recovery; (2) the same mechanism allows for encoding sequences of examples, and serves as an even more efficient mechanism for memory than autoencoding. Theoretically, we prove that when trained on a single example, autoencoders store the example as an attractor. Lastly, by treating a sequence encoder as a composition of maps, we prove that sequence encoding provides a more efficient mechanism for memory than autoencoding.