BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Adi Ditkowski

Adi Ditkowski contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
math.NANumerical Analysismath.APphysics.optics

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2021arXiv

Error Inhibiting Schemes for Initial Boundary Value Heat Equation

Finite Difference (FD) schemes are widely used in science and engineering for approximating solutions of partial differential equations (PDEs). Error analysis of FD schemes relies on estimating the truncation error at each time step. This approach usually leads to a global error whose order is of the same order of the truncation error. For classical FD schemes the global error is indeed of the same order as the truncation error. A particular class of FD schemes is the Block Finite Difference (BFD) schemes, in which the grid is divided into blocks. The structure of such schemes is similar to the structure of the Discontinuous Galerkin (DG) method, and allows inhabitation of the truncation errors. Recently, much effort was devoted to design BFD schemes whose global error converges faster than the truncation error. In this paper, we elaborate the approach presented in arXiv:1711.07926 for the heat equation with periodic boundary conditions. We generalize this methodology to design BFD schemes for the heat equation with Dirichlet or Neumann boundary conditions, whose global error converges faster than the truncation error. Such schemes are henceforth called Error Inhibiting Schemes. We provide an explicit error analysis, including proofs of stability and convergence of the proposed schemes. We illustrate our approach using several numerical examples, which demonstrate the efficiency of our method in comparison to standard FD schemes.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Explicit and implicit error inhibiting schemes with post-processing

Efficient high order numerical methods for evolving the solution of an ordinary differential equation are widely used. The popular Runge--Kutta methods, linear multi-step methods, and more broadly general linear methods, all have a global error that is completely determined by analysis of the local truncation error. In prior work in we investigated the interplay between the local truncation error and the global error to construct {\em error inhibiting schemes} that control the accumulation of the local truncation error over time, resulting in a global error that is one order higher than expected from the local truncation error. In this work we extend our error inhibiting framework to include a broader class of time-discretization methods that allows an exact computation of the leading error term, which can then be post-processed to obtain a solution that is two orders higher than expected from truncation error analysis. We define sufficient conditions that result in a desired form of the error and describe the construction of the post-processor. A number of new explicit and implicit methods that have this property are given and tested on a variety of ordinary and partial differential equation. We show that these methods provide a solution that is two orders higher than expected from truncation error analysis alone.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

IMEX error inhibiting schemes with post-processing

High order implicit-explicit (IMEX) methods are often desired when evolving the solution of an ordinary differential equation that has a stiff part that is linear and a non-stiff part that is nonlinear. This situation often arises in semi-discretization of partial differential equations and many such IMEX schemes have been considered in the literature. The methods considered usually have a a global error that is of the same order as the local truncation error. More recently, methods with global errors that are one order higher than predicted by the local truncation error have been devised (by Kulikov and Weiner, Ditkowski and Gottlieb). In prior work we investigated the interplay between the local truncation error and the global error to construct explicit and implicit {\em error inhibiting schemes} that control the accumulation of the local truncation error over time, resulting in a global error that is one order higher than expected from the local truncation error, and which can be post-processed to obtain a solution which is two orders higher than expected. In this work we extend our error inhibiting with post-processing framework introduced in our previous work to a class of additive general linear methods with multiple steps and stages. We provide sufficient conditions under which these methods with local truncation error of order p will produce solutions of order (p+1), which can be post-processed to order (p+2), and describe the construction of one such post-processor. We apply this approach to obtain implicit-explicit (IMEX) methods with multiple steps and stages. We present some of our new IMEX methods and show their linear stability properties, and investigate how these methods perform in practice on some numerical test cases.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Loss of Physical Reversibility in Reversible Systems

A dynamical system is said to be reversible if, given an output, the input can always be recovered in a well-posed manner. Nevertheless, we argue that reversible systems that have a time-reversal symmetry, such as the Nonlinear Schr{ö}dinger equation and the $ϕ^4$ equation can become "physically irreversible". By this, we mean that realistically-small experimental errors in measuring the output can lead to dramatic differences between the recovered input and the original one. The loss of reversibility reveals a natural "arrow of time", reminiscent of the thermodynamic one, which is the direction in which the radiation is emitted outward. Our results are relevant to imaging and reversal applications in nonlinear optics.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access