Researcher profile

Adam R. Day

Adam R. Day contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
8works
0followers
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

8 published item(s)

preprint2016arXiv

Jump operations for Borel graphs

We investigate the class of bipartite Borel graphs organized by the order of Borel homomorphism. We show that this class is unbounded by finding a jump operator for Borel graphs analogous to a jump operator of Louveau for Borel equivalence relations. The proof relies on a non-separation result for iterated Frechet ideals and filters due to Debs and Saint Raymond. We give a new proof of this fact using effective descriptive set theory. We also investigate an analogue of the Friedman-Stanley jump for Borel graphs. This analogue does not yield a jump operator for bipartite Borel graphs. However, we use it to answer a question of Kechris and Marks by showing that there is a Borel graph with no Borel homomorphism to a locally countable Borel graph, but each of whose connected components has a countable Borel coloring.

preprint2013arXiv

From Bi-immunity to Absolute Undecidability

An infinite binary sequence A is absolutely undecidable if it is impossible to compute A on a set of positions of positive upper density. Absolute undecidability is a weakening of bi-immunity. Downey, Jockusch and Schupp asked whether, unlike the case for bi-immunity, there is an absolutely undecidable set in every non-zero Turing degree. We provide a positive answer to this question by applying techniques from coding theory. We show how to use Walsh-Hadamard codes to build a truth-table functional which maps any sequence A to a sequence B, such that given any restriction of B to a set of positive upper density, one can recover A. This implies that if A is non-computable, then B is absolutely undecidable. Using a forcing construction, we show that this result cannot be strengthened in any significant fashion.

preprint2013arXiv

On The Strength of Two Recurrence Theorems

This paper uses the framework of reverse mathematics to investigate the strength of two recurrence theorems of topological dynamics. It establishes that one of these theorems, the existence of an almost periodic point, lies strictly between WKL and ACA (working over RCA_0). This is the first example of a theorem with this property. It also shows the existence of an almost periodic point is conservative over RCA_0 for Pi^1_1 sentences. These results establish the existence of a new upwards-closed subclass of the PA degrees

preprint2012arXiv

Limits to joining with generics and randoms

Posner and Robinson (1981) proved that if $S \subseteq ω$ is non-computable, then there exists a $G \subseteq ω$ such that $S \oplus G \geq_T G'$. Shore and Slaman (1999) extended this result to all $n \in ω$, by showing that if $S \nleq_T \emptyset^{(n-1)}$ then there exists a $G$ such that $S \oplus G \geq_T G^{(n)}$. Their argument employs Kumabe-Slaman forcing, and so the set they obtain, unlike that of the Posner-Robinson theorem, is not generic for Cohen forcing in any way. We answer the question of whether this is a necessary complication by showing that for all $n \geq 1$, the set $G$ of the Shore-Slaman theorem cannot be chosen to be even weakly 2-generic. Our result applies to several other effective forcing notions commonly used in computability theory, and we also prove that the set $G$ cannot be chosen to be 2-random.

preprint2011arXiv

The typical Turing degree

The Turing degree of a real measures the computational difficulty of producing its binary expansion. Since Turing degrees are tailsets, it follows from Kolmogorov's 0-1 law that for any property which may or may not be satisfied by any given Turing degree, the satisfying class will either be of Lebesgue measure 0 or 1, so long as it is measurable. So either the \emph{typical} degree satisfies the property, or else the typical degree satisfies its negation. Further, there is then some level of randomness sufficient to ensure typicality in this regard. A similar analysis can be made in terms of Baire category, where a standard form of genericity now plays the role that randomness plays in the context of measure. We describe and prove a number of results in a programme of research which aims to establish the properties of the typical Turing degree, where typicality is gauged either in terms of Lebesgue measure or Baire category.