BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Adam Brown

Adam Brown contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Computational GeometryData Structures and Algorithmsmath.ATmath.RTComputer Science and Game Theorymath.PRmath.STStatistics Theory

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
6works
0followers
8topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

6 published item(s)

preprint2024arXiv

Approximation Algorithms for the Weighted Nash Social Welfare via Convex and Non-Convex Programs

In an instance of the weighted Nash Social Welfare problem, we are given a set of $m$ indivisible items, $\mathscr{G}$, and $n$ agents, $\mathscr{A}$, where each agent $i \in \mathscr{A}$ has a valuation $v_{ij}\geq 0$ for each item $j\in \mathscr{G}$. In addition, every agent $i$ has a non-negative weight $w_i$ such that the weights collectively sum up to $1$. The goal is to find an assignment $σ:\mathscr{G}\rightarrow \mathscr{A}$ that maximizes $\prod_{i\in \mathscr{A}} \left(\sum_{j\in σ^{-1}(i)} v_{ij}\right)^{w_i}$, the product of the weighted valuations of the players. When all the weights equal $\frac1n$, the problem reduces to the classical Nash Social Welfare problem, which has recently received much attention. In this work, we present a $5\cdot\exp\left(2\cdot D_{\text{KL}}(\mathbf{w}\, ||\, \frac{\vec{\mathbf{1}}}{n})\right) = 5\cdot\exp\left(2\log{n} + 2\sum_{i=1}^n w_i \log{w_i}\right)$-approximation algorithm for the weighted Nash Social Welfare problem, where $D_{\text{KL}}(\mathbf{w}\, ||\, \frac{\vec{\mathbf{1}}}{n})$ denotes the KL-divergence between the distribution induced by $\mathbf{w}$ and the uniform distribution on $[n]$. We show a novel connection between the convex programming relaxations for the unweighted variant of Nash Social Welfare presented in \cite{cole2017convex, anari2017nash}, and generalize the programs to two different mathematical programs for the weighted case. The first program is convex and is necessary for computational efficiency, while the second program is a non-convex relaxation that can be rounded efficiently. The approximation factor derives from the difference in the objective values of the convex and non-convex relaxation.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Contravariant forms on Whittaker modules

Let $\mathfrak{g}$ be a complex semisimple Lie algebra. We give a classification of contravariant forms on the nondegenerate Whittaker $\mathfrak{g}$-modules $Y(χ, η)$ introduced by Kostant. We prove that the set of all contravariant forms on $Y(χ, η)$ forms a vector space whose dimension is given by the cardinality of the Weyl group of $\mathfrak{g}$. We also describe a procedure for parabolically inducing contravariant forms. As a corollary, we deduce the existence of the Shapovalov form on a Verma module, and provide a formula for the dimension of the space of contravariant forms on the degenerate Whittaker modules $M(χ, η)$ introduced by McDowell.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Contravariant pairings between standard Whittaker modules and Verma modules

We classify contravariant pairings between standard Whittaker modules and Verma modules over a complex semisimple Lie algebra. These contravariant pairings are useful in extending several classical techniques for category $\mathcal{O}$ to the Miličić--Soergel category $\mathcal{N}$. We introduce a class of costandard modules which generalize dual Verma modules, and describe canonical maps from standard to costandard modules in terms of contravariant pairings. We show that costandard modules have unique irreducible submodules and share the same composition factors as the corresponding standard Whittaker modules. We show that costandard modules give an algebraic characterization of the global sections of costandard twisted Harish-Chandra sheaves on the associated flag variety, which are defined using holonomic duality of $\mathcal{D}$-modules. We prove that with these costandard modules, blocks of category $\mathcal{N}$ have the structure of highest weight categories and we establish a BGG reciprocity theorem for $\mathcal{N}$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Determinant Maximization via Matroid Intersection Algorithms

Determinant maximization problem gives a general framework that models problems arising in as diverse fields as statistics \cite{pukelsheim2006optimal}, convex geometry \cite{Khachiyan1996}, fair allocations\linebreak \cite{anari2016nash}, combinatorics \cite{AnariGV18}, spectral graph theory \cite{nikolov2019proportional}, network design, and random processes \cite{kulesza2012determinantal}. In an instance of a determinant maximization problem, we are given a collection of vectors $U=\{v_1,\ldots, v_n\} \subset \RR^d$, and a goal is to pick a subset $S\subseteq U$ of given vectors to maximize the determinant of the matrix $\sum_{i\in S} v_i v_i^\top $. Often, the set $S$ of picked vectors must satisfy additional combinatorial constraints such as cardinality constraint $\left(|S|\leq k\right)$ or matroid constraint ($S$ is a basis of a matroid defined on the vectors). In this paper, we give a polynomial-time deterministic algorithm that returns a $r^{O(r)}$-approximation for any matroid of rank $r\leq d$. This improves previous results that give $e^{O(r^2)}$-approximation algorithms relying on $e^{O(r)}$-approximate \emph{estimation} algorithms \cite{NikolovS16,anari2017generalization,AnariGV18,madan2020maximizing} for any $r\leq d$. All previous results use convex relaxations and their relationship to stable polynomials and strongly log-concave polynomials. In contrast, our algorithm builds on combinatorial algorithms for matroid intersection, which iteratively improve any solution by finding an \emph{alternating negative cycle} in the \emph{exchange graph} defined by the matroids. While the $\det(.)$ function is not linear, we show that taking appropriate linear approximations at each iteration suffice to give the improved approximation algorithm.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Probabilistic Convergence and Stability of Random Mapper Graphs

We study the probabilistic convergence between the mapper graph and the Reeb graph of a topological space $\mathbb{X}$ equipped with a continuous function $f: \mathbb{X} \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$. We first give a categorification of the mapper graph and the Reeb graph by interpreting them in terms of cosheaves and stratified covers of the real line $\mathbb{R}$. We then introduce a variant of the classic mapper graph of Singh et al.~(2007), referred to as the enhanced mapper graph, and demonstrate that such a construction approximates the Reeb graph of $(\mathbb{X}, f)$ when it is applied to points randomly sampled from a probability density function concentrated on $(\mathbb{X}, f)$. Our techniques are based on the interleaving distance of constructible cosheaves and topological estimation via kernel density estimates. Following Munch and Wang (2018), we first show that the mapper graph of $(\mathbb{X}, f)$, a constructible $\mathbb{R}$-space (with a fixed open cover), approximates the Reeb graph of the same space. We then construct an isomorphism between the mapper of $(\mathbb{X},f)$ to the mapper of a super-level set of a probability density function concentrated on $(\mathbb{X}, f)$. Finally, building on the approach of Bobrowski et al.~(2017), we show that, with high probability, we can recover the mapper of the super-level set given a sufficiently large sample. Our work is the first to consider the mapper construction using the theory of cosheaves in a probabilistic setting. It is part of an ongoing effort to combine sheaf theory, probability, and statistics, to support topological data analysis with random data.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Sheaf-Theoretic Stratification Learning from Geometric and Topological Perspectives

In this paper, we investigate a sheaf-theoretic interpretation of stratification learning from geometric and topological perspectives. Our main result is the construction of stratification learning algorithms framed in terms of a sheaf on a partially ordered set with the Alexandroff topology. We prove that the resulting decomposition is the unique minimal stratification for which the strata are homogeneous and the given sheaf is constructible. In particular, when we choose to work with the local homology sheaf, our algorithm gives an alternative to the local homology transfer algorithm given in Bendich et al. (2012), and the cohomology stratification algorithm given in Nanda (2017). Additionally, we give examples of stratifications based on the geometric techniques of Breiding et al. (2018), illustrating how the sheaf-theoretic approach can be used to study stratifications from both topological and geometric perspectives. This approach also points toward future applications of sheaf theory in the study of topological data analysis by illustrating the utility of the language of sheaf theory in generalizing existing algorithms.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access