BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Abhyuday Mandal

Abhyuday Mandal contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
MethodologyComputation

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

EzGP: Easy-to-Interpret Gaussian Process Models for Computer Experiments with Both Quantitative and Qualitative Factors

Computer experiments with both quantitative and qualitative (QQ) inputs are commonly used in science and engineering applications. Constructing desirable emulators for such computer experiments remains a challenging problem. In this article, we propose an easy-to-interpret Gaussian process (EzGP) model for computer experiments to reflect the change of the computer model under the different level combinations of qualitative factors. The proposed modeling strategy, based on an additive Gaussian process, is flexible to address the heterogeneity of computer models involving multiple qualitative factors. We also develop two useful variants of the EzGP model to achieve computational efficiency for data with high dimensionality and large sizes. The merits of these models are illustrated by several numerical examples and a real data application.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Modeling and Active Learning for Experiments with Quantitative-Sequence Factors

A new type of experiment that aims to determine the optimal quantities of a sequence of factors is eliciting considerable attention in medical science, bioengineering, and many other disciplines. Such studies require the simultaneous optimization of both quantities and the sequence orders of several components which are called quantitative-sequence (QS) factors. Given the large and semi-discrete solution spaces in such experiments, efficiently identifying optimal or near-optimal solutions by using a small number of experimental trials is a nontrivial task. To address this challenge, we propose a novel active learning approach, called QS-learning, to enable effective modeling and efficient optimization for experiments with QS factors. QS-learning consists of three parts: a novel mapping-based additive Gaussian process (MaGP) model, an efficient global optimization scheme (QS-EGO), and a new class of optimal designs (QS-design). The theoretical properties of the proposed method are investigated, and optimization techniques using analytical gradients are developed. The performance of the proposed method is demonstrated via a real drug experiment on lymphoma treatment and several simulation studies.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Musings about Constructions of Efficient Latin Hypercube Designs with Flexible Run-sizes

Efficient Latin hypercube designs (LHDs), including maximin distance LHDs, maximum projection LHDs and orthogonal LHDs, are widely used in computer experiments. It is challenging to construct such designs with flexible sizes, especially for large ones. In the current literature, various algebraic methods and search algorithms have been proposed for identifying efficient LHDs, each having its own pros and cons. In this paper, we review, summarize and compare some currently popular methods aiming to provide guidance for experimenters on what method should be used in practice. Using the R package we developed which integrates and improves various algebraic and searching methods, many of the designs found in this paper are better than the existing ones. They are easy to use for practitioners and can serve as benchmarks for the future developments on LHDs.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Optimal Crossover Designs for Generalized Linear Models

We identify locally $D$-optimal crossover designs for generalized linear models. We use generalized estimating equations to estimate the model parameters along with their variances. To capture the dependency among the observations coming from the same subject, we propose six different correlation structures. We identify the optimal allocations of units for different sequences of treatments. For two-treatment crossover designs, we show via simulations that the optimal allocations are reasonably robust to different choices of the correlation structures. We discuss a real example of multiple treatment crossover experiments using Latin square designs. Using a simulation study, we show that a two-stage design with our locally $D$-optimal design at the second stage is more efficient than the uniform design, especially when the responses from the same subject are correlated.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access