BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Abhijith Sharma

Abhijith Sharma contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Cryptography and SecurityMachine LearningArtificial IntelligenceComputer Visioneess.IVeess.SYSystems and Control

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
7topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Adversarial Patch Attacks and Defences in Vision-Based Tasks: A Survey

Adversarial attacks in deep learning models, especially for safety-critical systems, are gaining more and more attention in recent years, due to the lack of trust in the security and robustness of AI models. Yet the more primitive adversarial attacks might be physically infeasible or require some resources that are hard to access like the training data, which motivated the emergence of patch attacks. In this survey, we provide a comprehensive overview to cover existing techniques of adversarial patch attacks, aiming to help interested researchers quickly catch up with the progress in this field. We also discuss existing techniques for developing detection and defences against adversarial patches, aiming to help the community better understand this field and its applications in the real world.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Embedded Model Predictive Control Using Robust Penalty Method

Model predictive control (MPC) has become a hot cake technology for various applications due to its ability to handle multi-input multi-output systems with physical constraints. The optimization solvers require considerable time, limiting their embedded implementation for real-time control. To overcome the bottleneck of traditional quadratic programming (QP) solvers, this paper proposes a robust penalty method (RPM) to solve an optimization problem in a linear MPC. The main idea of RPM is to solve an unconstrained QP problem using Broyden Fletcher Goldfarb Shannon (BFGS) algorithm. The beauty of this method is that it can find optimal solutions even if initial conditions are in an infeasible region, which makes it robust. Moreover, the RPM is computationally inexpensive as compared to the traditional QP solvers. The proposed RPM is implemented on resource-limited embedded hardware (STM32 microcontroller), and its performance is validated with a case study of a citation aircraft control problem. We show the hardware-in-the-loop co-simulation results of the proposed RPM and compared them with the active set method (ASM) and interior point method (IPM) QP solvers. The performance of MPC with the aforementioned solvers is compared by considering the optimality, time complexity, and ease of hardware implementation. Presented results show that the proposed RPM gives the same optimality as ASM and IPM, and outperforms them in terms of speed.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Soft Adversarial Training Can Retain Natural Accuracy

Adversarial training for neural networks has been in the limelight in recent years. The advancement in neural network architectures over the last decade has led to significant improvement in their performance. It sparked an interest in their deployment for real-time applications. This process initiated the need to understand the vulnerability of these models to adversarial attacks. It is instrumental in designing models that are robust against adversaries. Recent works have proposed novel techniques to counter the adversaries, most often sacrificing natural accuracy. Most suggest training with an adversarial version of the inputs, constantly moving away from the original distribution. The focus of our work is to use abstract certification to extract a subset of inputs for (hence we call it 'soft') adversarial training. We propose a training framework that can retain natural accuracy without sacrificing robustness in a constrained setting. Our framework specifically targets moderately critical applications which require a reasonable balance between robustness and accuracy. The results testify to the idea of soft adversarial training for the defense against adversarial attacks. At last, we propose the scope of future work for further improvement of this framework.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access