BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

A. J. Radcliffe

A. J. Radcliffe contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
math.CO

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
7works
0followers
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

7 published item(s)

preprint2021arXiv

Many cliques with few edges

Recently Cutler and Radcliffe proved that the graph on $n$ vertices with maximum degree at most $r$ having the most cliques is a disjoint union of $\lfloor n/(r+1)\rfloor$ cliques of size $r+1$ together with a clique on the remainder of the vertices. It is very natural also to consider this question when the limiting resource is edges rather than vertices. In this paper we prove that among graphs with $m$ edges and maximum degree at most $r$, the graph that has the most cliques of size at least two is the disjoint union of $\bigl\lfloor m \bigm/\binom{r+1}{2} \bigr\rfloor$ cliques of size $r+1$ together with the colex graph using the remainder of the edges.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Maximizing the density of $K_t$'s in graphs of bounded degree and clique number

Zykov showed in 1949 that among graphs on $n$ vertices with clique number $ω(G) \le ω$, the Turán graph $T_ω(n)$ maximizes not only the number of edges but also the number of copies of $K_t$ for each size $t$. The problem of maximizing the number of copies of $K_t$ has also been studied within other classes of graphs, such as those on $n$ vertices with maximum degree $Δ(G) \le Δ$. We combine these restrictions and investigate which graphs with $Δ(G) \le Δ$ and $ω(G) \le ω$ maximize the number of copies of $K_t$ per vertex. We define $f_t(Δ,ω)$ as the supremum of $ρ_t$, the number of copies of $K_t$ per vertex, among such graphs, and show for fixed $t$ and $ω$ that $f_t(Δ,ω) = (1+o(1))ρ_t(T_ω(Δ+\lfloor\fracΔ{ω-1}\rfloor))$. For two infinite families of pairs $(Δ,ω)$, we determine $f_t(Δ,ω)$ exactly for all $t\ge 3$. For another we determine $f_t(Δ,ω)$ exactly for the two largest possible clique sizes. Finally, we demonstrate that not every pair $(Δ,ω)$ has an extremal graph that simultaneously maximizes the number of copies of $K_t$ per vertex for every size $t$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Counting dominating sets and related structures in graphs

We consider some problems concerning the maximum number of (strong) dominating sets in a regular graph, and their weighted analogues. Our primary tool is Shearer's entropy lemma. These techniques extend to a reasonably broad class of graph parameters enumerating vertex colorings satisfying conditions on the multiset of colors appearing in (closed) neighborhoods. We also generalize further to enumeration problems for what we call existence homomorphisms. Here our results are substantially less complete, though we do solve some natural problems.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

The maximum number of complete subgraphs of fixed size in a graph with given maximum degree

In this paper, we make progress on a question related to one of Galvin that has attracted substantial attention recently. The question is that of determining among all graphs $G$ with $n$ vertices and $Δ(G)\leq r$, which has the most complete subgraphs of size $t$, for $t\geq 3$. The conjectured extremal graph is $aK_{r+1}\cup K_b$, where $n=a(r+1)+b$ with $0\leq b\leq r$. Gan, Loh, and Sudakov proved the conjecture when $a\leq 1$, and also reduced the general conjecture to the case $t=3$. We prove the conjecture for $r\leq 6$ and also establish a weaker form of the conjecture for all $r$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Graphs with the Fewest Matchings

In recent years there has been increased interest in extremal problems for "counting" parameters of graphs. For example, the Kahn-Zhao theorem gives an upper bound on the number of independent sets in a $d$-regular graph. In the same spirit, the Upper Matching Conjecture claims an upper bound on the number of $k$-matchings in a $d$-regular graph. Here we consider both matchings and matchings of fixed sizes in graphs with a given number vertices and edges. We prove that the graph with the fewest matchings is either the lex or the colex graph. Similarly, for fixed $k$, the graph with the fewest $k$-matchings is either the lex or the colex graph. To prove these results we first prove that the lex bipartite graph has the fewest matchings of all sizes among bipartite graphs with fixed part sizes and a given number of edges.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

The maximum number of complete subgraphs in a graph with given maximum degree

Extremal problems involving the enumeration of graph substructures have a long history in graph theory. For example, the number of independent sets in a $d$-regular graph on $n$ vertices is at most $(2^{d+1}-1)^{n/2d}$ by the Kahn-Zhao theorem. Relaxing the regularity constraint to a minimum degree condition, Galvin conjectured that, for $n\geq 2d$, the number of independent sets in a graph with $δ(G)\geq d$ is at most that in $K_{d,n-d}$. In this paper, we give a lower bound on the number of independent sets in a $d$-regular graph mirroring the upper bound in the Kahn-Zhao theorem. The main result of this paper is a proof of a strengthened form of Galvin's conjecture, covering the case $n\leq 2d$ as well. We find it convenient to address this problem from the perspective of $\complement{G}$. In other words, we give an upper bound on the number of complete subgraphs of a graph $G$ on $n$ vertices with $Δ(G)\leq r$, valid for all values of $n$ and $r$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Vertex Isoperimetric Inequalities for a Family of Graphs on Z^k

We consider the family of graphs whose vertex set is Z^k where two vertices are connected by an edge when their l\infty-distance is 1. We prove the optimal vertex isoperimetric inequality for this family of graphs. That is, given a positive integer n, we find a set A \subset Z^k of size n such that the number of vertices who share an edge with some vertex in A is minimized. These sets of minimal boundary are nested, and the proof uses the technique of compression. We also show a method of calculating the vertex boundary for certain subsets in this family of graphs. This calculation and the isoperimetric inequality allow us to indirectly find the sets which minimize the function calculating the boundary.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access