Source author record

A. Ianiro

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

Research overview

2works
3topics
4close collaborators

Published work

2 publications

preprint2022arXiv

Machine learning flow control with few sensor feedback and measurement noise

A comparative assessment of machine learning (ML) methods for active flow control is performed. The chosen benchmark problem is the drag reduction of a two-dimensional Kármán vortex street past a circular cylinder at a low Reynolds number (Re=100Re=100). The flow is manipulated with two blowing/suction actuators on the upper and lower side of a cylinder. The feedback employs several velocity sensors. Two probe configurations are evaluated: 5 and 11 velocity probes located at different points around the cylinder and in the wake. The control laws are optimized with Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) and Linear Genetic Programming Control (LGPC). By interacting with the unsteady wake, both methods successfully stabilize the vortex alley and effectively reduce drag while using small mass flow rates for the actuation. DRL has shown higher robustness with respect to variable initial conditions and to noise contamination of the sensor data; on the other hand, LGPC is able to identify compact and interpretable control laws, which only use a subset of sensors, thus allowing reducing the system complexity with reasonably good results. Our study points at directions of future machine learning control combining desirable features of different approaches.

preprint2020arXiv

Convolutional-network models to predict wall-bounded turbulence from wall quantities

Two models based on convolutional neural networks are trained to predict the two-dimensional velocity-fluctuation fields at different wall-normal locations in a turbulent open channel flow, using the wall-shear-stress components and the wall pressure as inputs. The first model is a fully-convolutional neural network (FCN) which directly predicts the fluctuations, while the second one reconstructs the flow fields using a linear combination of orthonormal basis functions, obtained through proper orthogonal decomposition (POD), hence named FCN-POD. Both models are trained using data from two direct numerical simulations (DNS) at friction Reynolds numbers Reτ=180Re_τ = 180 and 550550. Thanks to their ability to predict the nonlinear interactions in the flow, both models show a better prediction performance than the extended proper orthogonal decomposition (EPOD), which establishes a linear relation between input and output fields. The performance of the various models is compared based on predictions of the instantaneous fluctuation fields, turbulence statistics and power-spectral densities. The FCN exhibits the best predictions closer to the wall, whereas the FCN-POD model provides better predictions at larger wall-normal distances. We also assessed the feasibility of performing transfer learning for the FCN model, using the weights from Reτ=180Re_τ=180 to initialize those of the Reτ=550Re_τ=550 case. Our results indicate that it is possible to obtain a performance similar to that of the reference model up to y+=50y^{+}=50, with 50%50\% and 25%25\% of the original training data. These non-intrusive sensing models will play an important role in applications related to closed-loop control of wall-bounded turbulence.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.