Researcher profile

A. Hanslmeier

A. Hanslmeier contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 19 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
5works
0followers
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

A prediction for the 25th solar cycle maximum amplitude

The minimum - maximum method, belonging to the precursor class of the solar activity forecasting methods, is based on a linear relationship between relative sunspot number in the minimum and maximum epochs of solar cycles. In the present analysis we apply a modified version of this method using data not only from the minimum year, but also from a couple of years before and after the minimum. The revised 13-month smoothed monthly total sunspot number data set from SILSO/SIDC is used. Using data for solar cycle nos. 1-24 the largest correlation coefficient (CC) is obtained when correlating activity level 3 years before solar cycle minimum with the subsequent maximum (CC = 0.82), independent of inclusion or exclusion of the solar cycle no. 19. For the next solar maximum of the cycle no. 25 we predict: Rmax = 121 +- 33. Our results indicate that the next solar maximum (of the cycle no. 25) will be of the similar amplitude as the previous one, or even something lower. This is in accordance with the general middle-term lowering of the solar activity after the secular maximum in the 20th century and consistent with the Gleissberg period of the solar activity. The reliability of the 3 years before the minimum predictor is experimentally justified by the largest correlation coefficient and verified with the Student t-test. It is satisfactorily explained with the two empirical well-known findings: the extended solar cycle and the Waldmeier effect. Finally, we successfully reproduced the maxima of the last four solar cycles, nos. 21-25, using the 3 years before the minimum method.

preprint2022arXiv

Variation in solar differential rotation and activity in the period 1964-2016 determined by the Kanzelhöhe data set

We determined the differential rotation (DR) parameters $A$ and $B$ (corresponding to the equatorial rotation velocity and the gradient of the solar DR) by tracing sunspot groups in sunspot drawings of the Kanzelhöhe Observatory for Solar and Environmental Research (KSO; 1964-2008, for solar cycles (SC) 20-23) and KSO white-light images (2009-2016, for SC 24). We used different statistical methods and approaches to analyse cycle related variations, solar cycle phase-related variations and long-term variations of the DR. $A$ and $B$ show statistically significant periodic variability. The changes in $A$ related to solar cycle phase are in accordance with previously reported theoretical and experimental results (higher $A$ during solar minimum, lower $A$ during the maximum of activity), while changes in $B$ differ from the theoretical predictions as we observe more negative values of $B$, that is, a more pronounced DR during activity maximum. The main result of this paper for the long-term variations in $A$ is the detection of a phase shift between the activity flip (in the 1970s) and the equatorial rotation velocity flip (in the early 1990s). During this time period both $A$ and activity show a secular decreasing trend, indicating their correlation. Therefore, the theoretical model fails in the phase-shift time period that occurs after the modern Gleissberg maximum, while in the time period thereafter (after the 1990s), theoretical and experimental results are consistent. The long-term variations in $B$ in general yield an anticorrelation of $B$ and activity, as a rise of $B$ is observed during the entire time period (1964-2016) we analysed, during which activity decreased. We study for the first time the variation in solar DR and activity based on 53 years of KSO data. Our results agree well with the results related to the solar cycle phase from corona observations.

preprint2021arXiv

Prominence instability and CMEs triggered by massive coronal rain in the solar atmosphere

Triggering process for prominence instability and consequent CMEs is not fully understood. Prominences are maintained by the Lorentz force against the gravity, therefore reduction of the prominence mass due to the coronal rain may cause the change of the force balance and hence destabilisation of the structures. We aim to study the observational evidence of the influence of coronal rain on the stability of prominence and subsequent eruption of CMEs. We used the simultaneous observations from AIA/SDO and SECCHI/STEREO spacecrafts from different angles to follow the dynamics of prominence/filaments and to study the role of coronal rain in their destabilisation. Three different prominences/filaments observed during years 2011-2012 were analysed using observations acquired by SDO and STEREO. In all three cases massive coronal rain from the prominence body led to the destabilisation of prominence and subsequently to the eruption of CMEs. The upward rising of prominences consisted in the slow and the fast rise phases. The coronal rain triggered the initial slow rise of prominences, which led to the final instability (the fast rise phase) after 18-28 hours in all cases. The estimated mass flux carried by coronal rain blobs showed that the prominences became unstable after 40 \% of mass loss. We suggest that the initial slow rise phase was triggered by the mass loss of prominence due to massive coronal rain, while the fast rise phase, i.e. the consequent instability of prominences, was caused by the torus instability and/or magnetic reconnection with overlying coronal field. Therefore, the coronal rain triggered the instability of prominences and consequent CMEs. If this is the case, then the coronal rain can be used to predict the CMEs and hence to improve the space weather predictions.

preprint2020arXiv

A census of Coronal Mass Ejections on solar-like stars

Coronal Mass Ejections (CMEs) may have major importance for planetary and stellar evolution. Stellar CME parameters, such as mass and velocity, have yet not been determined statistically. So far only a handful of stellar CMEs has been detected mainly on dMe stars using spectroscopic observations. We therefore aim for a statistical determination of CMEs of solar-like stars by using spectroscopic data from the ESO phase 3 and Polarbase archives. To identify stellar CMEs we use the Doppler signal in optical spectral lines being a signature of erupting filaments which are closely correlated to CMEs. We investigate more than 3700 hours of on-source time of in total 425 dF-dK stars. We find no signatures of CMEs and only few flares. To explain this low level of activity we derive upper limits for the non detections of CMEs and compare those with empirically modelled CME rates. To explain the low number of detected flares we adapt a flare power law derived from EUV data to the Hα regime, yielding more realistic results for Hα observations. In addition we examine the detectability of flares from the stars by extracting Sun-as-a-star Hα light curves. The extrapolated maximum numbers of observable CMEs are below the observationally determined upper limits, which indicates that the on-source times were mostly too short to detect stellar CMEs in Hα. We conclude that these non detections are related to observational biases in conjunction with a low level of activity of the investigated dF-dK stars.

preprint2020arXiv

The BRITE-SONG of Aldebaran -- Stellar Music in three voices

Solar-like oscillations in red-giant stars are now commonly detected in thousands of stars with space telescopes such as the NASA Kepler mission. Parallel radial velocity and photometric measurements would help to better understand the physics governing the amplitudes of solar-like oscillators. Yet, most target stars for space photometry are too faint for light-demanding ground-based spectroscopy. The BRITE Constellation satellites provide a unique opportunity of two-color monitoring of the flux variations of bright luminous red giants. Those targets are also bright enough to be monitored with high-resolution spectrographs on small telescopes, such as the SONG Network. In these proceedings, we provide a first overview of our comprehensive, multi-year campaign utilizing both BRITE and SONG to seismically characterize Aldebaran, one of the brightest red giants in the sky. Because luminous red giants can be seen at large distances, such well-characterized objects will serve as benchmark stars for galactic archeology.