BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

A. Emin Orhan

A. Emin Orhan appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Machine LearningNeural and Evolutionary ComputingNeurons and CognitionComputer Vision

Catalog footprint

What is connected

6works
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

6 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Can deep learning match the efficiency of human visual long-term memory in storing object details?

Humans have a remarkably large capacity to store detailed visual information in long-term memory even after a single exposure, as demonstrated by classic experiments in psychology. For example, Standing (1973) showed that humans could recognize with high accuracy thousands of pictures that they had seen only once a few days prior to a recognition test. In deep learning, the primary mode of incorporating new information into a model is through gradient descent in the model's parameter space. This paper asks whether deep learning via gradient descent can match the efficiency of human visual long-term memory to incorporate new information in a rigorous, head-to-head, quantitative comparison. We answer this in the negative: even in the best case, models learning via gradient descent require approximately 10 exposures to the same visual materials in order to reach a recognition memory performance humans achieve after only a single exposure. Prior knowledge induced via pretraining and bigger model sizes improve performance, but these improvements are not very visible after a single exposure (it takes a few exposures for the improvements to become apparent), suggesting that simply scaling up the pretraining data size or model size might not be a feasible strategy to reach human-level memory efficiency.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

How much human-like visual experience do current self-supervised learning algorithms need in order to achieve human-level object recognition?

This paper addresses a fundamental question: how good are our current self-supervised visual representation learning algorithms relative to humans? More concretely, how much "human-like" natural visual experience would these algorithms need in order to reach human-level performance in a complex, realistic visual object recognition task such as ImageNet? Using a scaling experiment, here we estimate that the answer is several orders of magnitude longer than a human lifetime: typically on the order of a million to a billion years of natural visual experience (depending on the algorithm used). We obtain even larger estimates for achieving human-level performance in ImageNet-derived robustness benchmarks. The exact values of these estimates are sensitive to some underlying assumptions, however even in the most optimistic scenarios they remain orders of magnitude larger than a human lifetime. We discuss the main caveats surrounding our estimates and the implications of these surprising results.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Improved memory in recurrent neural networks with sequential non-normal dynamics

Training recurrent neural networks (RNNs) is a hard problem due to degeneracies in the optimization landscape, a problem also known as vanishing/exploding gradients. Short of designing new RNN architectures, previous methods for dealing with this problem usually boil down to orthogonalization of the recurrent dynamics, either at initialization or during the entire training period. The basic motivation behind these methods is that orthogonal transformations are isometries of the Euclidean space, hence they preserve (Euclidean) norms and effectively deal with vanishing/exploding gradients. However, this ignores the crucial effects of non-linearity and noise. In the presence of a non-linearity, orthogonal transformations no longer preserve norms, suggesting that alternative transformations might be better suited to non-linear networks. Moreover, in the presence of noise, norm preservation itself ceases to be the ideal objective. A more sensible objective is maximizing the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the propagated signal instead. Previous work has shown that in the linear case, recurrent networks that maximize the SNR display strongly non-normal, sequential dynamics and orthogonal networks are highly suboptimal by this measure. Motivated by this finding, here we investigate the potential of non-normal RNNs, i.e. RNNs with a non-normal recurrent connectivity matrix, in sequential processing tasks. Our experimental results show that non-normal RNNs outperform their orthogonal counterparts in a diverse range of benchmarks. We also find evidence for increased non-normality and hidden chain-like feedforward motifs in trained RNNs initialized with orthogonal recurrent connectivity matrices.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Improving the robustness of ImageNet classifiers using elements of human visual cognition

We investigate the robustness properties of image recognition models equipped with two features inspired by human vision, an explicit episodic memory and a shape bias, at the ImageNet scale. As reported in previous work, we show that an explicit episodic memory improves the robustness of image recognition models against small-norm adversarial perturbations under some threat models. It does not, however, improve the robustness against more natural, and typically larger, perturbations. Learning more robust features during training appears to be necessary for robustness in this second sense. We show that features derived from a model that was encouraged to learn global, shape-based representations (Geirhos et al., 2019) do not only improve the robustness against natural perturbations, but when used in conjunction with an episodic memory, they also provide additional robustness against adversarial perturbations. Finally, we address three important design choices for the episodic memory: memory size, dimensionality of the memories and the retrieval method. We show that to make the episodic memory more compact, it is preferable to reduce the number of memories by clustering them, instead of reducing their dimensionality.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Are Performance Limitations in Visual Short-Term Memory Tasks Due to Capacity Limitations or Model Mismatch?

Performance limitations in visual short-term memory (VSTM) tasks have traditionally been explained in terms of resource or capacity limitations. It has been claimed, for example, that VSTM possesses a limited amount of cognitive or neural "resources" that can be used to remember a visual display. In this paper, we highlight the potential importance of a previously neglected factor that might contribute significantly to performance limitations in VSTM tasks: namely, a mismatch between the prior expectations and/or the internal noise properties of the visual system based primarily on its adaptation to the statistics of the natural environment and the statistics of the visual stimuli used in most VSTM experiments. We call this 'model mismatch'. Surprisingly, we show that model mismatch alone, without assuming a general resource or capacity limitation, can, in principle, account for some of the main qualitative characteristics of performance limitations observed in VSTM tasks, including: (i) monotonic decline in memory precision with increasing set size; (ii) variability in memory precision across items and trials; and (iii) different set-size dependencies for initial encoding rate and asymptotic precision when the duration of image presentation is varied. We also investigate the consequences of using experimental stimuli that more closely match the prior expectations and/or internal noise properties of the visual system. The results reveal qualitatively very different patterns of behavior for such stimuli, suggesting that researchers should be cautious about generalizing the results of experiments using ecologically unrealistic stimulus statistics to ecologically more realistic stimuli.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Neural Population Coding of Multiple Stimuli

In natural scenes, objects generally appear together with other objects. Yet, theoretical studies of neural population coding typically focus on the encoding of single objects in isolation. Experimental studies suggest that neural responses to multiple objects are well described by linear or nonlinear combinations of the responses to constituent objects, a phenomenon we call stimulus mixing. Here, we present a theoretical analysis of the consequences of common forms of stimulus mixing observed in cortical responses. We show that some of these mixing rules can severely compromise the brain's ability to decode the individual objects. This cost is usually greater than the cost incurred by even large reductions in the gain or large increases in neural variability, explaining why the benefits of attention can be understood primarily in terms of a stimulus selection, or demixing, mechanism rather than purely as a gain increase or noise reduction mechanism. The cost of stimulus mixing becomes even higher when the number of encoded objects increases, suggesting a novel mechanism that might contribute to set size effects observed in myriad psychophysical tasks. We further show that a specific form of neural correlation and heterogeneity in stimulus mixing among the neurons can partially alleviate the harmful effects of stimulus mixing. Finally, we derive simple conditions that must be satisfied for unharmful mixing of stimuli.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access