Paper detail

Zodiacal Exoplanets in Time. XI. The Orbit and Radiation Environment of the Young M Dwarf-Hosted Planet K2-25b

M dwarf stars are high-priority targets for searches for Earth-size and potentially Earth-like planets, but their planetary systems may form and evolve in very different circumstellar environments than those of solar-type stars. To explore the evolution of these systems, we obtained transit spectroscopy and photometry of the Neptune-size planet orbiting the ~650 Myr-old Hyades M dwarf K2-25. An analysis of the variation in spectral line shape induced by the Doppler "shadow" of the planet indicate that the planet's orbit is closely aligned with the stellar equator (lambda = -1.7+5.8/-3.7 deg), and that an eccentric orbit found by previous work could arise from perturbations by another planet on a co-planar orbit. We detect no significant variation in the depth of the He I line at 1083 nm during transit. A model of atmospheric escape as a isothermal Parker wind with a solar composition show that this non-detection is not constraining compared to escape rate predictions of ~0.1 Mearth/Gyr; at such rates, at least several Gyr are required for a Neptune-like planet to evolve into a rocky super-Earth.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access23 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.