Paper detail

Zero-point Divacancy Concentration in the Shadow Wave-Function Model for Solid 4He

We address the issue of interaction between zero-point vacancies in solid 4He as described within the shadow wave-function model. Applying the reversible-work method and taking into account finite-size effects, we obtain a zero-point monovacancy concentration of (2.03 +- 0.02) 10^{-3}, which is slightly higher than the result due to Reatto et al. for the same model. Utilizing the same methodology, we then consider the divacancy, taking into account both the in-plane as well as out-of-plane configurations with respect to the basal plane. We find no significant anisotropy between both conformation. Furthermore, although there is a small binding tendency, the expected divacancy concentration is only ~4-5 times larger than the value expected in the absence of any clustering propensity, 2.5 10^{-5}. This result suggests that, within the employed model description, no vacancy aggregation leading to phase separation is to be expected in the ground state.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.