Paper detail

Zero-metallicity very low mass stars as halo dark matter

Hubble Space Telescope (HST) limits on the amount of halo dark matter (DM) in the form of very low-mass (VLM) stars close to the hydrogen-burning limit have been interpreted as excluding such stars as viable candidates. However, these limits assume that the stars are smoothly distributed and have at least the metallicity of Population II stars, whilst some baryonic DM formation theories predict that they may instead be clumped into globular-cluster configurations and have close to zero metallicity. I re-analyse the HST data employing the zero-metallicity VLM star models of Saumon et al. (1994), which predict V-I colours below the cuts of previous analyses for stars below 0.2 Mo. From the models I derive new limits on the allowed halo fraction comprising VLM stars for both the unclustered and clustered cases. In the unclustered regime I find a 95% confidence upper limit on the allowed halo fraction of 1.4% inferred from 20 HST fields, comparable to limits derived by previous studies for non-zero metallicity populations. In the cluster scenario I show that clusters of mass M and radius R can satisfy both HST and the recent MACHO gravitational microlensing results, which indicate a lens halo fraction of 40% for a standard halo model, provided R < 1.2 (M/10^4 Mo)^0.74 pc. However, existing dynamical limits restrict the allowed range to a tiny region characterised by M \sim 4x10^4 Mo and R \sim 3 pc. Furthermore, consistency between MACHO and HST demands a present-day clustering efficiency of 92% or better. Intriguingly however, the cluster mass implied by these limits is theoretically well motivated and the VLM star scenario may also help to provide an explanation for the faint red `halo' light recently reported around another galaxy.

preprint1997arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.