Paper detail

Zero Impact Parameter White Dwarf Collisions in FLASH

We systematically explore zero impact parameter collisions of white dwarfs with the Eulerian adaptive grid code FLASH for 0.64+0.64 M$_{\odot}$ and 0.81+0.81 M$_{\odot}$ mass pairings. Our models span a range of effective linear spatial resolutions from 5.2$\times10^{7}$ to 1.2$\times10^{7}$ cm. However, even the highest resolution models do not quite achieve strict numerical convergence, due to the challenge of properly resolving small-scale burning and energy transport. The lack of strict numerical convergence from these idealized configurations suggest that quantitative predictions of the ejected elemental abundances that are generated by binary white dwarf collision and merger simulations should be viewed with caution. Nevertheless, the convergence trends do allow some patterns to be discerned. We find that the 0.64+0.64 M$_{\odot}$ head-on collision model produces 0.32 M$_{\odot}$ of \nickel[56] and 0.38 M$_{\odot}$ of \silicon[28], while the 0.81+0.81 M$_{\odot}$ head-on collision model produces 0.39 M$_{\odot}$ of \nickel[56] and 0.55 M$_{\odot}$ of \silicon[28] at the highest spatial resolutions. Both mass pairings produce $\sim$0.2 M$_{\odot}$ of unburned \carbon[12]+\oxygen[16]. We also find the 0.64+0.64 M$_{\odot}$ head-on collision begins carbon burning in the central region of the stalled shock between the two white dwarfs, while the more energetic \hbox{0.81+0.81 M$_{\odot}$} head-on collision raises the initial post-shock temperature enough to burn the entire stalled shock region to nuclear statistical equilibrium.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.