Paper detail

$Z_H \rightarrow H^0 γ$ decay within the littlest Higgs model at $\mathcal{O}(α_{\rm ew}^{3}α_s)$ accuracy

We study the rare decay $Z_H \rightarrow H^0 γ$ at $\mathcal{O}(α_{\rm ew}^{3}α_s)$ accuracy including two-loop QCD corrections in the context of the littlest Higgs model (LHM) without $T$-parity. We revisit analytically and numerically the leading-order (LO) contributions of the one-loop diagrams induced by massive fermions, scalars and charged gauge bosons in the LHM, and further study the NLO QCD correction to this decay process. We perform the numerical calculation by taking the LHM input parameters $f=3,~4~\text{TeV}$ and $0.1< c <0.6$, and discuss the numerical results of the decay width up to the QCD NLO within the recent experimentally constrained LHM parameter space region. Our results show that the two-loop QCD correction always reduces the LO decay width and the top-induced QCD correction is the dominant contribution at the QCD NLO. For $f=4~\text{TeV}$ and $c=0.3$, the NLO QCD corrected decay width reaches $75.099~\text{keV}$ and the NLO QCD relative correction is about $-11.0\%$.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.