Paper detail

z~2-9 Galaxies magnified by the Hubble Frontier Field Clusters I: Source Selection and Surface Density-Magnification Constraints from >2500 galaxies

We assemble a large comprehensive sample of 2534 z~2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9 galaxies lensed by the six clusters from the Hubble Frontier Fields (HFF) program. Making use of the availability of multiple independent magnification models for each of the HFF clusters and alternatively treating one of the models as the &#34;truth,&#34; we show that the median magnification factors from the v4 parametric models are typically reliable to values of 30 to 50, and in one case to 100. Using the median magnification factor from the latest v4 models, we estimate the UV luminosities of the 2534 lensed z~2-9 galaxies, finding sources as faint as -12.4 mag at z~3 and -12.9 mag at z~7. We explicitly demonstrate the power of the surface density-magnification relations Sigma(z) vs. mu in the HFF clusters to constrain both distant galaxy properties and cluster lensing properties. Based on the Sigma(z) vs. mu relations, we show that the median magnification estimates from existing public models must be reliable predictors of the true magnification mu to mu<15 (95% confidence). We also use the observed Sigma(z) vs. mu relations to derive constraints on the evolution of the luminosity function faint-end slope from z~7 to z~2, showing that faint-end slope results can be consistent with blank-field studies if, and only if, the selection efficiency shows no strong dependence on the magnification factor mu. This can only be the case if very low luminosity galaxies are very small, being unresolved in deep lensing probes.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.