Paper detail

Yield correlations and $p_T$ dependence of charm hadrons in Pb + Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}= 2.76$ TeV

Recently the ALICE Collaboration has published a few data of charm hadrons in Pb + Pb collisions at the CERN Large Hadron Collider (LHC). We extend the quark combination to the charm sector and point out that the measurement of charm hadron yields can provide important insights into charm quark hadronization mechanism and properties of the hot and dense matter produced in high energy reactions. We propose several types of yield ratios, e.g. $D^{*+}/D^0$, $D_s^+/D^+$ and $Λ_c^+/D_s^+$, to measure various properties of low $p_T$ charm quark hadronization. We argue that ratios $D_s^+/D^0$ and $2D_s^+/(D^0+D^+)$ as the function of transverse momentum can serve as good probes for the dynamics of charm quark hadronization. We further make predictions for the yields and $p_T$ spectra of identified charm hadrons in central Pb + Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}= 2.76$ TeV.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.