Paper detail

Yield, Area and Energy Optimization in Stt-MRAMs using failure aware ECC

Spin Transfer Torque MRAMs are attractive due to their non-volatility, high density and zero leakage. However, STT-MRAMs suffer from poor reliability due to shared read and write paths. Additionally, conflicting requirements for data retention and write-ability (both related to the energy barrier height of the magnet) makes design more challenging. Furthermore, the energy barrier height depends on the physical dimensions of the free layer. Any variations in the dimensions of the free layer lead to variations in the energy barrier height. In order to address poor reliability of STT-MRAMs, usage of Error Correcting Codes (ECC) have been proposed. Unlike traditional CMOS memory technologies, ECC is expected to correct both soft and hard errors in STT_MRAMs. To achieve acceptable yield with low write power, stronger ECC is required, resulting in increased number of encoded bits and degraded memory efficiency. In this paper, we propose Failure aware ECC (FaECC), which masks permanent faults while maintaining the same correction capability for soft errors without increased encoded bits. Furthermore, we investigate the impact of process variations on run-time reliability of STT-MRAMs. We provide an analysis on the impact of process variations on the life-time of the free layer and retention failures. In order to analyze the effectiveness of our methodology, we developed a cross-layer simulation framework that consists of device, circuit and array level analysis of STT-MRAM memory arrays. Our results show that using FaECC relaxes the requirements on the energy barrier height, which reduces the write energy and results in smaller access transistor size and memory array area. Keywords: STT-MRAM, reliability, Error Correcting Codes, ECC, magnetic memory

preprint2016arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.