Paper detail

Yarkovsky effect in Generalized Photogravitational 3-Bodies Problem

Here is presented a generalization of photogravitational restricted 3-bodies problem to the case of influence of Yarkovsky effect, which is known as reason of additional infinitesimal acceleration of a small bodies in the space (due to anisotropic re-emission of absorbed energy from the sun, other stellar sources). Asteroid is supposed to move under the influence of gravitational forces from 2 massive bodies (which are rotating around their common centre of masses on Kepler trajectories), as well under the influence of pressure of light from both the primaries. Analyzing the ODE system of motion, we explore the existense of equilibrium points for a small body (asteroid) in the case when the 2-nd primary is non-oblate spheroid. In such a case, it is proved the existence of maximally 256 different non-planar libration points in generalized photogravitational restricted 3-bodies problem when we take into consideration even a small Yarkovsky effect.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.