Paper detail

XPM nonlinearities:Are all involved photons real?

We have found a novel symmetry for XPM(Cross Phase Modulation) systems .We prove that this symmetry is a necessary condition for a single multiphoton process to be visible in more than one field.We have found, two EIT(Electromagnetically Induced Transparency) systems that show cases of this symmetry.The above process has the possibility of leading to strong sources of temporally entangled photons of different frequency. For cases that do not show this symmetry,more than one "species" of multiphoton processes can take place and each one is visible in one field only. When there is a symmetry, we predict cross field noise correlations for the scattered fields.Cross field noise correlations have recently been seen in a different situation that can provide interesting variation to our study,namely the generated fields in FWM(Four Wave Mixing). We postulate or conjecture the existence of two types of asymmetric multiphoton processes.We show only one of these is possible. One of systems we use for this purpose generates a $χ^{(9)}$ absorption resonance that is observable on the same trace that shows linear features, in an experiment described in a previous work but the order of nonlinearity newly interpreted using this work.This high order nonlinearity should be very sensitive to cross field correlations.We show how it can be used to test our conjecture of asymmetric processes. We also come across an important $χ^{(5)}$ absorption,comparable to linear absorption, that is anomalous.The anomaly is that the Imaginary part of this XPM nonlinearity can cause squeezing.We give a qualitative argument which shows that we don't expect the Imaginary part of the XPM nonlinearities we usually come across, to cause squeezing.This promising source of squeezing, is qualitatively different from the other sources hitherto known.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.