Paper detail

XMM-Newton view of PKS 2155-304: hardness ratio and cross-correlation analysis of EPIC pn observations

With currently available XMM-Newton EPIC pn observations spanned over about 3 years, we present a detailed spectral and temporal variability of the 0.2--10 keV X-ray emission from the X-ray bright BL Lac object PKS 2155-304. The spectral variability is examined with a model independent hardness ratio method. We find that the spectral evolution of the source follows the light curves well, indicating that the spectra harden when the fluxes increase. The plots of hardness ratios versus count rates show that the spectral changes are particularly significant during flares. The cross-correlation functions (CCFs) show that the light curves in the different energy bands are well correlated at different time lags. The CCF peaks (i.e., the maximum correlation coefficients) tend to become smaller with larger energy differences, and the variability in the different energy bands are more correlated for the flares than for the other cases. In most cases the higher energy band variations lead the lower energy band, but in two cases we observed the opposite behavior that the lower energy variability possibly leads the higher energy variability. The time lags increase with the energy differences between the two cross-correlated light curves. The maximum lag is found to be up to about one hour, in support with the findings obtained with previous low Earth orbit X-ray missions. We discuss our results in the context of the particle acceleration, cooling and light crossing timescales.

preprint2005arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.