Paper detail

XMM-Newton study of hard X-ray sources in IC443

We present \xmm observations of hard X-ray emission from the field of IC443, a supernova remnant interacting with a molecular cloud. The hard emission from the field is dominated by 12 isolated sources having 2--10 keV flux $\ga 10^{-14}$ $\enf$. Only a fraction of the sources are expected to be extragalactic or stars on statistical grounds, while the others may be associated with the remnant. We have analyzed near-infrared K band and also DSS optical data for all of the detected sources, finding that six X-ray sources are located in a relatively small $15^\prime\times 15^\prime$ region where there is strong 2.2 $μ{\rm m}$ infrared emission, indicating interaction with a molecular cloud. The source 1SAX J0618.0+2227, the brightest in this region (excluding the plerion), is resolved with \xmm into two sources, one of which is extended and has a hard power law spectrum photon index $\lsim$ 1.5) and shows some indications of spectral line signatures (e.g. Si), while the other is point-like and has a featureless spectrum of steeper photon index $\sim$ 2.2. Possible interpretations of some of the discrete sources in terms of interaction between the SNR and the molecular cloud are discussed.

preprint2003arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.