Paper detail

XMM-Newton observations of the Galactic Centre Region - I: The distribution of low-luminosity X-ray sources

We exploit XMM-Newton archival data in a study of the extended X-ray emission emanating from the Galactic Centre (GC) region. EPIC-pn and EPIC-MOS observations, with a total exposure approaching 0.5 and 1 Ms respectively, were used to create mosaiced images of a 100 pc x 100 pc region centred on Sgr A* in four bands covering the 2-10 keV energy range. We have also constructed a set of narrow-band images corresponding to the neutral iron fluorescence line at 6.4 keV and the K-shell lines at 6.7 keV and 6.9 keV from helium-like and hydrogenic iron. We use a combination of spatial and spectral information to decompose the GC emission into three distinct components. These comprise: the emission from hard X-ray emitting unresolved point sources; the reflected continuum and fluorescent line emission from dense molecular material; and the soft diffuse emission from thermal plasma in the temperature range, kT ~ 0.8-1.5 keV. We show that the unresolved-source component accounts for the bulk of the 6.7-keV and 6.9-keV line emission. We fit the observed X-ray surface brightness distribution with an empirical 2-d model, which we then compare with a 3-d mass-model prediction for the old stellar population in the GC. The X-ray surface brightness falls-off more rapidly with angular offset from Sgr A* than predicted. One interpretation is that the 2-10 keV X-ray emissivity increases from 5 x 10^27 erg s^-1 Msun^-1 at 20' up to almost twice this value at 2'. Alternatively, some refinement of the mass model may be required. The unresolved hard X-ray emitting source population, on the basis of spectral comparisons, is most likely dominated by magnetic CVs. We use the X-ray observations to set constraints on the number density of such sources. Our analysis does not support the conjecture that a significant fraction of the hard X-ray emission from the GC originates in very-hot diffuse thermal plasma.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.