Paper detail

XMM-Newton and Suzaku detection of an X-ray emitting shell around the pulsar wind nebula G54.1+0.3

Recent X-ray observations have proved to be very effective in detecting previously unknown supernova remnant shells around pulsar wind nebulae (PWNe), and in these cases the characteristics of the shell provide further clues on the evolutionary stage of the embedded PWN. However, it is not clear why some PWNe are still "naked". We carried out an X-ray observational campaign targeted at the PWN G54.1+0.3, the "close cousin" of the Crab, with the aim to detect the associated SNR shell. We analyzed an XMM-Newton and Suzaku observations of G54.1+0.3 and we model out the contribution of dust scattering halo. We detected an intrinsic faint diffuse X-ray emission surrounding a hard spectrum, which can be modeled either with a power-law (gamma= 2.9) or with a thermal plasma model (kT=2.0 keV.). If the shell is thermal, we derive an explosion energy E=0.5-1.6x10^51 erg, a pre-shock ISM density of 0.2 cm^-3 and an age of about 2000 yr. Using these results in the MHD model of PWN-SNR evolution, we obtain an excellent agreement between the predicted and observed location of the shell and PWN shock.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.