Paper detail

xGASS: passive disks do not host unexpectedly large reservoirs of cold atomic hydrogen

We use the extended GALEX Arecibo SDSS Survey (xGASS) to quantify the relationship between atomic hydrogen (HI) reservoir and current star formation rate (SFR) for central disk galaxies. This is primarily motivated by recent claims for the existence, in this sample, of a large population of passive disks harbouring HI reservoirs as large as those observed in main sequence galaxies. Across the stellar mass range 10$^{9}<$M$_{*}$/M$_{\odot}<$10$^{11}$, we practically find no passive ($\gtrsim$2$σ$ below the star-forming main sequence) disk galaxies with HI reservoirs comparable to those typical of star-forming systems. Even including HI non detections at their upper limits, passive disks typically have $\geq$0.5 dex less HI than their active counterparts. We show that previous claims are due to the use of aperture-corrected SFR estimates from the MPA/JHU SDSS DR7 catalog, which do not provide a fair representation of the global SFR of HI-rich galaxies with extended star-forming disks. Our findings confirm that the bulk of the passive disk population in the local Universe is HI-poor. These also imply that the reduction of star formation, even in central disk galaxies, has to be accompanied by a reduction in their HI reservoir.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.