Paper detail

X-ray variability of PMS stars - Toward an explanation of the different X-ray properties of CTTS and WTTS

The intense X-ray emission from coronae and accretion shocks in young PMS stars is likely to play an important role in the evolution and dispersal of circumstellar disks. Several aspects of the physics of this X-ray emission remain mysterious, e.g., whether and how much accretion affects coronal emission. We studied the X-ray variability of ~1 Myr old low-mass PMS stars as a function of timescale, stellar rotation, and stellar characteristics, in order to gain insights on the working of PMS coronae, their X-ray emission, and the circumstellar environment in which they are immersed. We have exploited the ~850 ksec long Chandra observation of the Orion Nebula Cluster obtained by the COUP collaboration in Jan. 2003, and statistically analyzed the X-ray lightcurves of low-mass stars in several subsamples. In particular, we characterized the different X-ray behavior of stars with and without circumstellar accretion disks. Accreting stars (Classical T Tauri Stars, CTTSs) are found to be more variable than non accreting ones (Weak-lined T Tauri Stars, WTTSs) at all timescales and in all the X-ray energy bands considered. Variability is seen to increase with time-scale up to ~10 days, i.e. the longest probed. Signatures of rotational modulation are observed for both CTTSs and WTTSs, and most clearly for CTTSs in the soft X-ray band. Lower mass stars are more variable than higher mass ones. We propose that the difference in variability between CTTSs and WTTSs may be explained assuming that the X-ray emission of CTTS is affected by time-variable absorption due circumstellar structures, such as warps in the inner disk and/or accretion streams. This suggestion is appealing because, in the hypothesis that the coronae of CTTSs and WTTSs are similar, it may also explain why CTTSs have lower and more scattered X-ray emission levels with respect to WTTSs.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.