Paper detail

X-ray, UV and optical analysis of supergiants: $ε$ Ori

We present a multi-wavelength (X-ray to optical) analysis, based on non-local thermodynamic equilibrium photospheric+wind models, of the B0 Ia-supergiant: $ε$~Ori. The aim is to test the consistency of physical parameters, such as the mass-loss rate and CNO abundances, derived from different spectral bands. The derived mass-loss rate is $\dot{M}/\sqrt{f_\infty}\sim$1.6$\times$10$^{-6}$ M$_\odot$ yr$^{-1}$ where $f_\infty$ is the volume filling factor. However, the S IV $λλ$1062,1073 profiles are too strong in the models; to fit the observed profiles it is necessary to use $f_\infty<$0.01. This value is a factor of 5 to 10 lower than inferred from other diagnostics, and implies $\dot{M} \lesssim1 \times 10^{-7}$ M$_\odot$ yr$^{-1}$. The discrepancy could be related to porosity-vorosity effects or a problem with the ionization of sulfur in the wind. To fit the UV profiles of N V and O VI it was necessary to include emission from an interclump medium with a density contrast ($ρ_{cl}/ρ_{ICM}$) of $\sim$100. X-ray emission in H-He like and Fe L lines was modeled using four plasma components located within the wind. We derive plasma temperatures from $1 \times 10^{6}$ to $7\times 10^{6}$ K, with lower temperatures starting in the outer regions (R$_0\sim$3-6 R$_*$), and a hot component starting closer to the star (R$_0\lesssim$2.9 R$_*$). From X-ray line profiles we infer $\dot{M} <\, 4.9\times10^{-7}$ M$_\odot$ yr$^{-1}$. The X-ray spectrum ($\geq$0.1 kev) yields an X-ray luminosity $L_{\rm X}\sim 2.0\times10^{-7} L_{\rm bol}$, consistent with the superion line profiles. X-ray abundances are in agreement with those derived from the UV and optical analysis: $ε$ Ori is slightly enhanced in nitrogen and depleted in carbon and oxygen, evidence for CNO processed material.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.