Paper detail

X-ray Twinkles and Pop III Stars

Pop III stars are typically massive stars of primordial composition forming at the centers of the first collapsed dark matter structures. Here we estimate the optimal X-ray emission in the early universe for promoting the formation of Pop III stars. This is important in determining the number of dwarf galaxies formed before reionization and their fossils in the local universe, as well as the number of intermediate-mass seed black holes. A mean X-ray emission per source above the optimal level reduces the number of Pop III stars because of the increased Jeans mass of the intergalactic medium (IGM), while a lower emission suppresses the formation rate of H2 preventing or delaying star formation in dark matter minihalos above the Jeans mass. The build up of the H2 dissociating background is slower than the X-ray background due to the shielding effect of resonant hydrogen Lyman lines. Hence, the nearly unavoidable X-ray emission from supernova remnants of Pop III stars is sufficient to boost their number to few tens per comoving Mpc^3 by redshift z~15. We find that there is a critical X-ray to UV energy ratio emitted per source that produces a universe where the number of Pop III stars is largest: 400 per comoving- Mpc^3. This critical ratio is very close to the one provided by 20-40 M_sun Pop III stars exploding as hypernovae. High mass X-ray binaries in dwarf galaxies are far less effective at increasing the number of Pop III stars than normal supernova remnants, we thus conclude that supernovae drove the formation of Pop III stars.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.