Paper detail

X-Ray Studies of Redbacks

We consider the X-ray properties of the redback class of eclipsing millisecond pulsars. These are transitional systems between accreting low-mass X-ray binaries and binary millisecond pulsars orbiting white dwarfs, and hence their companions are non-degenerate and nearly Roche-lobe filling. The X-ray luminosity seems to scale with the fraction of the pulsar sky subtended by the companion, suggesting the shock region is not much larger than the companion, which is supported by modeling of the orbital light curves. The typical X-ray photon spectral index is $\sim 1$ and the typical 0.3-8 keV X-ray efficiency, assuming a shock size on the order of the companion's Roche lobe cross-section, is on the order of 10%. We present an overview of previous investigations, and present new observations of two redbacks, a Chandra observation of PSR J1628$-$3205 and a XMM-Newton observation of PSR J2129$-$0429. The latter shows a clearly double peaked orbital light curve with variation of the non-thermal flux by a factor of $\sim 11$, with peaks around orbital phases 0.6 and 0.9. We suggest the magnetic field of the companion plays a significant role in the X-ray emission from intrabinary shocks in redbacks.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.