Paper detail

X-ray Selected Narrow-Line Active Galactic Nuclei in the COSMOS Field: Nature of Optically Dull Active Galactic Nuclei

X-ray emission detection in a galaxy is one of the efficient tools for selecting Active Galactic Nuclei (AGNs). However, many X-ray-selected AGNs are not easily selected as AGNs by their optical emission. These galaxies, so-called optically dull (OD) AGNs, are fascinating since their X-ray emission is bright even though the AGN signature in the optical regime is absent. In a deep multiwavelength survey over 2 deg$^2$ of the Cosmic Evolution Survey (COSMOS) field, we have looked for the OD AGNs using photometric, spectroscopic, and X-ray data. We identified 310 non-broad line sources with optical spectra as AGN using X-ray selection up to redshift $z\sim 1.5$. We inspected the spectra to check for any AGN signature in their optical emission lines: [Ne V] forbidden emission line, Mass Excitation diagram (MEx), color excitation diagram (TBT), and excess in [O II ] emission line. Finally, we found 48 AGNs show AGN signatures in the optical spectrum classified as narrow-line AGN and 180 AGNs that did not show any AGN signature as OD AGN sample. The simple explanation of OD AGN's nature is due to a bright host galaxy that dilutes the AGN light or dust materials obscuring the AGN light. The bright host galaxy dilution explains nearly $70\%$ of our OD AGN sample. At the same time, the dust material obscuration is unlikely for the main reason. By estimating the Eddington ratio, we also found that 95/180 of our OD AGNs have a lower accretion rate of $(λ_\text{Edd})\lesssim 10^{-2}$ than the typical AGN value. We expected the lower accretion rate sources that suffer from neither host galaxy dilution nor obscuration to have Radiatively Inefficient Flow (RIAF) in their accretion disk. Finally, nine sources have been identified to be most likely host the RIAF disk.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.