Paper detail

X-ray properties of the z ~ 4.5 Lyman-alpha Emitters in the Chandra Deep Field South Region

We report the first X-ray detection of 113 Lyman-alpha emitters at redshift z ~ 4.5. Only one source (J033127.2-274247) is detected in the Extended Chandra Deep Field South (ECDF-S) X-ray data, and has been spectroscopically confirmed as a z = 4.48 quasar with $L_X = 4.2\times 10^{44}$ erg/s. The single detection gives a Lyman-alpha quasar density consistent with the X-ray luminosity function of quasars. The coadded counts of 22 Lyman-alpha emitters (LAEs) in the central Chandra Deep Field South (CDF-S) region yields a S/N=2.4 (p=99.83%) detection at soft band, with an effective exposure time of ~36 Ms. Further analysis of the equivalent width (EW) distribution shows that all the signal comes from 12 LAE candidates with EW_rest < 400 Å, and 2 of them contribute about half of the signal. Following-up spectroscopic observations show that the two are a low-redshift emission line galaxy and a Lyman break galaxy at z = 4.4. Excluding these two and combined with ECDF-S data, we derive a 3-sigma upper limit on the average luminosity of $L_{0.5-2 keV}$ $<$ 2.4 $\times 10^{42}$ ergs/s for z ~ 4.5 LAEs. If the average X-ray emission is due to star formation, it corresponds to a star-formation rate (SFR) of < 180--530 M$_\sun$ per yr. We use this SFR_X as an upper limit of the unobscured SFR to constrain the escape fraction of Lyman-alpha photons, and find a lower limit of f_esc > 3-10%. However, our upper limit on the SFR_X is ~7 times larger than the upper limit on SFR_X on z ~ 3.1 LAEs in the same field, and at least 30 times higher than the SFR estimated from Lyman-alpha emission. From the average X-ray to Lyman-alpha line ratio, we estimate that fewer than 3.2% (6.3%) of our LAEs could be high redshift type 1 (type 2) AGNs, and those hidden AGNs likely show low rest frame EWs.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.