Paper detail

X-ray properties of early-type stars in the Tarantula Nebula from T-ReX

We reassess the historical $L_{X}/L_{Bol}$ relation for early-type stars from a comparison between T-ReX, the Chandra ACIS X-ray survey of the Tarantula Nebula in the LMC, and contemporary spectroscopic analysis of massive stars obtained primarily from VLT/FLAMES, VLT/MUSE and HST/STIS surveys. For 107 sources in common (some host to multiple stars), the majority of which are bolometrically luminous (40% exceed $10^6 L_{\odot}$), we find an average $\log L_{X} /L_{Bol} = -6.90 \pm 0.65$. Excluding extreme systems Mk 34 (WN5h+WN5h), R140a (WC4+WN6+) and VFTS 399 (O9 IIIn+?), plus four WR sources with anomalously hard X-ray components (R130, R134, R135, Mk 53) and 10 multiple sources within the spatially crowded core of R136a, $\log L_{X}/L_{Bol} = -7.00 \pm 0.49$, in good agreement with Galactic OB stars. No difference is found between single and binary systems, nor between O, Of/WN and WR stars, although there does appear to be a trend towards harder X-ray emission from O dwarfs, through O (super)giants, Of/WN stars and WR stars. The majority of known OB stars in the Tarantula are not detected in the T-ReX point source catalogue, so we have derived upper limits for all undetected OB stars for which log $L_{Bol}/L_{\odot} \geq 5.0$. A survival analysis using detected and upper-limit log $L_{X}/L_{Bol}$ values indicates no significant difference between luminous O stars in the LMC and the Carina Nebula. This analysis suggests that metallicity does not strongly influence $L_{X}/L_{Bol}$. Plasma temperatures for single, luminous O stars in the Tarantula ($\overline{kT_{m}}=1.0$ keV) are higher than counterparts in Carina ($\overline{kT_{m}}=0.5$ keV).

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.