Paper detail

X-ray properties of BzK-selected galaxies in the deepest X-ray fields

We investigate the X-ray properties of BzK-selected galaxies at z $\sim$ 2 using deep X-ray data in the Chandra Deep Field South and North (CDFS and CDFN). Of these we directly detect in X-rays 49 sBzKs in CDFS and 32 sBzKs in CDFN. Stacking the undetected sources also reveals a significant X-ray signal. Investigating the X-ray detection rate and stacked flux versus the IR excess parameter (i.e. SFRtotal/SFRUV,corr), we find no strong evidence for an increased X-ray detection rate, or a harder X-ray spectrum in IR Excess sBzKs. This is particularly the case when one accounts for the strong correlation between the IR excess parameter and the bolometric IR luminosity (LIR), e.g. when controlling for LIR, the IR Non-Excess sBzKs show a detection rate at least as high. While both direct detections and stacking suggest that the AGN fraction in sBzK galaxies is high, there is no clear evidence for widespread Compton thick activity in either the sBzK population generally, or the IR Excess sBzK subsample. The very hard X-ray signal obtained for the latter in earlier work was most likely contaminated by a few hard X-ray sources now directly detected in deeper X-ray data. The X-ray detection fraction of passive BzK galaxies in our sample is if anything higher than that of sBZKs, so there is no evidence for coeval black hole growth and star formation from X-ray analysis of the BzK populations. Because increased AGN activity in the IR excess population is not indicated by our X-ray analysis, it appears that the bulk of the IR Excess sBzK population are luminous star-forming galaxies whose SFRs are either overestimated at 24 microns, underestimated in the UV, or both. This conclusion reinforces recent results from Herschel which show similar effects.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.