Paper detail

X-ray plateaus in $γ$-ray bursts explained by structured jets

The follow-up of $γ$-ray bursts (GRBs) by the X-ray telescope (XRT, 0.3-10 keV) on board the Neil Gehrels Swift Observatory led to the discovery of a shallow decay phase (the so-called plateau) of the X-ray emission in a good fraction of GRBs. This unexpected temporal behaviour does not fit the standard GRB afterglow expectation. Thus, in the last years, many models emerged, that invoke energy injection into the external shock, requiring long-lasting activity of the central engine of GRBs. We discuss a new alternative, comprehensive model: the plateau phase originates from the high latitude emission (i.e., the radiation observed from larger angles relative to the line of sight, after the prompt emission from a curved surface is switched off) when the jet exhibits bulk motion and intensity structure. This model enables us to reproduce not only the temporal behaviour of the X-ray light curves, but also the diversity of joint optical-to-X-ray emission.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.