Paper detail

X-ray Identifications of FIRST Radio Sources in the xBootes Field

With the goal of investigating the nature and the environment of the faint radio sources (at mJy level), here are presented results of X-ray dentifications of Faint Imaging Radio Survey at Twenty centimetres (FIRST) in the 9 square degrees Bootes field of the NOAO Deep Wide Field Survey (NDWFS), using data from the Chandra XBootes survey. A total of 92 (10%) FIRST radio sources are identified above the X-ray flux limit f_X (0.5-7) keV = 8x10^{-15} erg s^{-1} cm^{-2}, and 79 optical counterparts are common to both the radio and X-ray sources. Spectroscopic identifications were available for 22 sources (27%). Multi-wavelength optical/infrared photometric data (Bw~25.5 mag, R~25.8 mag, I~25.5 mag and K~19.4 mag) were available for this field and were used to derive photometric redshift for the remaining 57 sources without spectroscopic information. Most of the radio-X-ray matches are optically extended objects in the R band with a photometric redshift distribution peaking at z~0.7. Based on the hardness ratio and X-ray luminosity, 37 sources (89%) were classified as AGN-1, 19 as AGN-2, 12 as QSO-1, 2 as QSO-2 and 9 sources as normal galaxies. While the majority of these sources have a hard X-ray luminosity L_X(2-7) keV >10^{42} erg s^{-1}, about one third of the sources have L_X(2-7) keV >10^{44} erg s^{-1} and therefore classified as QSO-1. The majority (68%) of the radio-X-ray matched population are found to have -1<log l_X/f_opt<1, region indicative of AGNs, 23% with high X-ray-to-optical flux ratio (log f_X/f_opt > 1), suggesting high redshift and/or dust obscured AGN, and 11% of the radio-X-ray matches that are X-ray faint optically bright sources with log f_X/f_opt <-1, and most of these sources are optically extended. These objects are low-z, normal galaxies or low luminosity AGNs (LINERS).

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.