Paper detail

X-Ray galaxy clusters: constraints on models of galaxy formation

We present a self-consistent approach to the modeling of X-ray clusters of galaxies in a flat universe. Employing the Press and Schechter (1974) formalism to derive the mass function and relating the observable properties of clusters to their virial mass allows us to study the cluster X-ray distribution functions and their evolution with redshift. This approach differs from some results based on the X-ray luminosity function, which we argue is subject to modeling uncertainties. We obtain stringent constraints on the power spectrum of the initial density perturbations assumed to seed galaxy formation by comparing the theoretical temperature function with available data: the amplitude $σ_8$ is found to be $0.57 \pm 0.05$, while the local spectral index $n$ is falling in the range $-2.4 \leq n \leq -1.5$ on scales between 5 and 15 $h^{-1}$ Mpc: the standard CDM model is clearly ruled out, independently of the normalization. We further examine the evolutionary properties of X-ray clusters. Our approach greatly clarifies the situation: contrary to some previous claims, we find that flat models are in reasonable agreement with the observed number of clusters at high redshif ts. We also examine the contribution of clusters to the X-ray counts and to the soft X-ray background and compare the expected values in the case of the $Ω_0=1$ and $Ω_0=0.2$ universes. The number counts are in agreement with the observations, further confirming the relevance of our modeling. We conclude that although clusters are not the primary source of the soft X-ray background, their contribution is nevertheless non-negligible. This is particularly important for they could escape the constraints imposed on possible point sources contributing to the background. Finally, we briefly

preprint1996arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.