Paper detail

X-ray emission of contact binary variables within 1 kpc

By assembling the largest sample to date of X-ray emitting EW-type binaries (EWXs), we carried out correlation analyses for the X-ray luminosity log$L_{\textrm{X}}$, and X-ray activity level log($L_{\textrm{X}}$/$L_{\textrm{bol}}$) versus the orbital period $P$ and effective temperature $T_{\rm eff}$. We find strong $P$-log$L_{\textrm{X}}$ and $P$-log($L_{\textrm{X}}$/$L_{\textrm{bol}}$) correlations for EWXs with $P$ < 0.44 days and we provide the linear parametrizations for these relations, on the basis of which the orbital period can be treated as a good predictor for log$L_{\textrm{X}}$ and log($L_{\textrm{X}}$/$L_{\textrm{bol}}$). The aforementioned binary stellar parameters are all correlated with log$L_{\textrm{X}}$, while only $T_{\rm eff}$ exhibits a strong correlation with log($L_{\textrm{X}}$/$L_{\textrm{bol}}$). Then, EWXs with higher temperature show lower X-ray activity level, which could indicate the thinning of the convective area related to the magnetic dynamo mechanism. The total X-ray luminosity of an EWX is essentially consistent with that of an X-ray saturated main sequence star with the same mass as its primary, which may imply that the primary star dominates the X-ray emission. The monotonically decreasing $P$-log($L_{\textrm{X}}$/$L_{\textrm{bol}}$) relation and the short orbital periods indicate that EWXs could all be in the X-ray saturated state, and they may inherit the changing trend of the saturated X-ray luminosities along with the mass shown by single stars. For EWXs, the orbital period, mass, and effective temperature increase in concordance. We demonstrate that the period $P=0.44$ days corresponds to the primary mass of $\sim1.1 \rm M_\odot$, beyond which the saturated X-ray luminosity of single stars will not continue to increase with mass. This explains the break in the positive $P$-log$L_{\textrm{X}}$ relation for EWXs with $P>0.44$ days.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.