Paper detail

X-ray bursting neutron star atmosphere models using an exact relativistic kinetic equation for Compton scattering

Theoretical spectra of X-ray bursting neutron star (NS) model atmospheres are widely used to determine the basic NS parameters such as their masses and radii. We construct accurate NS atmosphere models using for the first time an exact treatment of Compton scattering via the integral relativistic kinetic equation. We also compare the results with the previous calculations based on the Kompaneets operator. We solve the radiation transfer equation together with the hydrostatic equilibrium equation accounting exactly for the radiation pressure by electron scattering. We thus construct a new set of plane-parallel atmosphere models in LTE for hot NSs. The models were computed for six chemical compositions (pure H, pure He, solar H/He mix with various heavy elements abundances Z = 1, 0.3, 0.1, and 0.01 Z_sun, and three log g = 14.0, 14.3, and 14.6. For each chemical composition and log g, we compute more than 26 model atmospheres with various luminosities relative to the Eddington luminosity L_Edd computed for the Thomson cross-section. The maximum relative luminosities L/L_Edd reach values of up to 1.1 for high gravity models. The emergent spectra of all models are redshifted and fitted by diluted blackbody spectra in the 3--20 keV energy range appropriate for the RXTE/PCA. We also compute the color correction factors f_c. The radiative acceleration g_rad in our luminous, hot-atmosphere models is significantly smaller than in corresponding models based on the Kompaneets operator, because of the Klein-Nishina reduction of the electron scattering cross-section, and therefore formally "super-Eddington" model atmospheres do exist. The differences between the new and old model atmospheres are small for L / L_Edd < 0.8. For the same g_rad / g, the new f_c are slightly larger (by approximately 1%) than the old values.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.