Paper detail

X-ray and optical variability of the ultraluminous X-ray source NGC 1313 X-2

We present an analysis of recent XMM-Newton and HST archive data of the ultraluminous X-ray source NGC 1313 X-2. Quasi-simultaneous observations taken with XMM-Newton, HST and VLT allow us to study both the X-ray light curve and its correlation with the optical emission of the two proposed ULX counterparts. At the end of December 2003 the source experienced a short, but intense flare, reaching a maximum luminosity of ~10^40 erg/s. At the same time, the optical flux of both the suggested counterparts did not show pronounced variations (<30%). Assuming that the ULX emission is isotropic and taking X-ray reprocessing into account, the optical data for one of the proposed counterparts are consistent with it being an early type, main sequence star of about 10-18 Msun losing matter through Roche-lobe overflow onto a ~120 Msun black hole at an orbital separation corresponding to a period of about 2 days.

preprint2006arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.