Paper detail

X- and Gamma-Ray Flashes from Type Ia Supernovae?

We investigate two potential mechanisms that will produce X-ray and gamma-ray flashes from Type Ia supernovae (SN-Ia). The mechanisms are the breakout of the thermonuclear burning front as it reaches the surface of the white dwarf and the interaction of the rapidly expanding envelope with an accretion disk. Based on the delayed-detonation scenario and detailed radiation-hydro calculation which include nuclear networks, we find that both mechanisms produce ~1 second flashes of high energy radiation with peak luminosities of 10^48 to 10^50 erg/sec with fast rises and exponential declines. The X- and gamma-ray visibility of a SN-Ia will depend strongly on self absorption within the progenitor system, specifically on the properties of the accretion disk and its orientation towards the observer. Such X-ray and gamma-ray flashes could be detected as triggered events by Gamma-Ray Burst (GRB) detectors on satellites, with events in current GRB catalogs. We have searched through the GRB catalogs (for the BATSE, HETE, and Swift experiments) for GRBs that occur at the extrapolated time of explosion and in the correct direction for known Type Ia supernovae with radial velocity of less than 3,000 km/s. For BATSE about 12.9+-3.6 nearby SNe Ia should have been detected, but only 0.8+-0.7 non-coincidental matches have been found. With the HETE and Swift satellites, we expect to see 5.6+-1.3 SN-Ia flashes from known nearby SNe Ia but, yet, no SN-Ia flashes were detected. These place observational limits that the bolometric peak luminosity of SN-Ia Flashes must be less ~10^46 erg/s. We attribute the difference between theory and observational limits to the absorption of the X- and gamma-rays by the accretion disk of large scale height or common envelope that would be smothering the white dwarf.

preprint2009arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.