Paper detail

WRAY 977 (GX301-2): A HYPERGIANT WITH PULSAR COMPANION

Wray 977, the B supergiant companion of the X-ray pulsar GX301-2, should be classified as B1~Ia+, based on a comparison of its optical spectrum to that of zeta1 Sco, a well-known B hypergiant and ONE OF THE BRIGHTEST STARS IN THE GALAXY. The classification of Wray 977 as a hypergiant results in a new distance determination of the binary system, i.e. 5.3 kpc (previously 1.8 +/- 0.4 kpc). The ``average&#39;&#39; X-ray luminosity of the pulsar is then ~10^37 erg/s, in good agreement with the predicted X-ray luminosity resulting from accretion of a dense, low-velocity (v_infty = 400 km/s) stellar wind. A mass-loss rate of <= 10^-5 M_sun/yr is estimated from the Halpha profile. A new upper limit for the inclination of the system is derived which provides a lower limit to the (present) mass of Wray 977 (48 M_sun). Regarding current binary evolution scenarios, the empirical lower mass limit for BLACK-HOLE formation in a binary increases to M_zams >= 50 M_sun.

preprint1995arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.